Dependent-test-aware regression testing techniques
Wing Lam, August Shi, Reed Oei, Sai Zhang, Michael D. Ernst, Tao Xie
Abstract
Developers typically rely on regression testing techniques to ensure that their changes do not break existing functionality. Unfortunately, regression testing techniques suffer from flaky tests, which can both pass and fail when run multiple times on the same version of code and tests. One prominent type of flaky tests is order-dependent (OD) tests, which are tests that pass when run in one order but fail when run in another order. Although OD tests may cause flaky-test failures, OD tests can help developers run their tests faster by allowing them to share resources. We propose to make regression testing techniques dependent-test-aware to reduce flaky-test failures. To understand the necessity of dependent-test-aware regression testing techniques, we conduct the first study on the impact of OD tests on three regression testing techniques: test prioritization, test selection, and test parallelization. In particular, we implement 4 test prioritization, 6 test selection, and 2 test parallelization algorithms, and we evaluate them on 11 Java modules with OD tests. When we run the orders produced by the traditional, dependent-test-unaware regression testing algorithms, 82% of human-written test suites and 100% of automatically-generated test suites with OD tests have at least one flaky-test failure. We develop a general approach for enhancing regression testing algorithms to make them dependent-test-aware, and we apply our approach to enhance 12 algorithms. Compared to traditional, unenhanced regression testing algorithms, the enhanced algorithms use provided test dependencies to produce orders with different permutations or extra tests. Our evaluation shows that, in comparison to the orders produced by unenhanced algorithms, the orders produced by enhanced algorithms (1) have overall 80% fewer flaky-test failures due to OD tests, and (2) may add extra tests but run only 1% slower on average. Our results suggest that enhancing regression testing algorithms to be dependent-test-aware can substantially reduce flaky-test failures with only a minor slowdown to run the tests.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e80cb623-ee4f-48c4-b7c1-aaa0c8967bddCited by top-tier papers10
- Empirically evaluating readily available information for regression test optimization in continuous integrationDaniel Elsner, Florian Hauer, Alexander Pretschner, Silke ReimerISSTA 2021 · 45 citations
- Repairing Order-Dependent Flaky Tests via Test GenerationChengpeng Li, Chenguang Zhu, Wenxi Wang, August ShiICSE 2022 · 22 citations
- Preempting Flaky Tests via Non-Idempotent-Outcome TestsAnjiang Wei, Pu Yi, Zhengxi Li, Tao Xie et al.ICSE 2022 · 20 citations
- FlakiMe: Laboratory-Controlled Test Flakiness Impact AssessmentMaxime Cordy, Renaud Rwemalika, Adriano Franci, Mike Papadakis et al.ICSE 2022 · 14 citations
- Evolution-aware detection of order-dependent flaky testsChengpeng Li, August ShiISSTA 2022 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Ranking Relevant Tests for Order-Dependent Flaky TestsShanto Rahman, Bala Naren Chanumolu, Suzzana Rafi, August Shi et al.ICSE 2025 · 1 citation
- Systematically Producing Test Orders to Detect Order-Dependent Flaky TestsChengpeng Li, Mohammad Mahdi Khosravi, Wing Lam, August ShiISSTA 2023 · 10 citations
- FlakeFlagger: Predicting Flakiness Without Rerunning TestsAbdulrahman Alshammari, Christopher Morris, Michael Hilton, Jonathan BellICSE 2021 · 63 citations
- FlakeSync: Automatically Repairing Async Flaky TestsShanto Rahman, August ShiICSE 2024 · 7 citations
- Empirically revisiting and enhancing IR-based test-case prioritizationQianyang Peng, August Shi, Lingming ZhangISSTA 2020 · 49 citations
