Lune

ASE2022Top-tier venue

Answer Summarization for Technical Queries: Benchmark and New Approach

Chengran Yang, Bowen Xu, Ferdian Thung, Yucen Shi, Ting Zhang, Zhou Yang, Xin Zhou, Jieke Shi, Junda He, DongGyun Han, David Lo

2022Year
12Citations
4Top-tier citations

Abstract

Prior studies have demonstrated that approaches to generate an answer summary for a given technical query in Software Question and Answer (SQA) sites are desired. We find that existing approaches are assessed solely through user studies. Hence, a new user study needs to be performed every time a new approach is introduced; this is time-consuming, slows down the development of the new approach, and results from different user studies may not be comparable to each other. There is a need for a benchmark with ground truth summaries as a complement assessment through user studies. Unfortunately, such a benchmark is non-existent for answer summarization for technical queries from SQA sites.

To fill the gap, we manually construct a high-quality benchmark to enable automatic evaluation of answer summarization for the technical queries for SQA sites. It contains 111 query-summary pairs extracted from 382 Stack Overflow answers with 2,014 sentence candidates. Using the benchmark, we comprehensively evaluate the performance of existing approaches and find that there is still a big room for improvements.

Motivated by the results, we propose a new approach Tech-SumBot with three key modules:1) Usefulness Ranking module; 2) Centrality Estimation module; and 3) Redundancy Removal module. We evaluate TechSumBot in both automatic (i.e., using our benchmark) and manual (i.e., via a user study) manners. The results from both evaluations consistently demonstrate that TechSum-Bot outperforms the best performing baseline approaches from both SE and NLP domains by a large margin, i.e., 10.83%-14.90%, 32.75%-36.59%, and 12.61%-17.54%, in terms of ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, and ROUGE-L on automatic evaluation, and 5.79%-9.23% and 17.03%-17.68%, in terms of average usefulness and diversity score on human evaluation. This highlights that automatic evaluation on our benchmark can uncover findings similar to the ones found through user studies. More importantly, the automatic evaluation

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext e7f346eb-1c2d-4d49-b2d1-67ca8bcc874f

Cited by top-tier papers4

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on7

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines