Lune

ICLR2026Top-tier venue

LFQA-E: Carefully Benchmarking Long-form QA Evaluation

Yuchen Fan, Chen Ling, Xin Zhong, Shuo Zhang, Heng Zhou, Yuchen Zhang, Mingyu Liang, Chengxing Xie, Ermo Hua, Zhizhou He, Cheng Huang, Gang Chen

2026Year
2Citations

Abstract

Long-Form Question Answering (LFQA) involves generating comprehensive, paragraph-level responses to open-ended questions, which poses a significant challenge for evaluation due to the richness of information and flexible response format. Existing LFQA-evaluation benchmarks often lack reference answers and are limited in size and topic coverage, reducing their reliability. To address this gap, we introduce LFQA-E, a well-constructed, multilingual, and reference-based benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate automatic metrics for LFQA. LFQA-E comprises 1618 questions and 7323 pairwise comparisons across 15 topics, drawn from diverse sources such as online queries and examination questions, thereby enabling a comprehensive assessment of evaluation metrics. We examine five categories of metrics, encompassing 17 specific methods, using LFQA-E. The results demonstrate that none of the existing automatic metrics perform comparably to human judgments, highlighting their inability to capture the dense information in long-form responses. Furthermore, we present a detailed analysis of the failure cases and the generalization capacity of these metrics, offering insights to guide the future development of LFQA evaluation methods. The benchmark and code are available at https://github.com/YuchenFan48/LFQA-E .

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext e7eef6dc-d856-450a-ba27-f5dea9ea6a7f

Builds on14

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines