LFQA-E: Carefully Benchmarking Long-form QA Evaluation
Yuchen Fan, Chen Ling, Xin Zhong, Shuo Zhang, Heng Zhou, Yuchen Zhang, Mingyu Liang, Chengxing Xie, Ermo Hua, Zhizhou He, Cheng Huang, Gang Chen
Abstract
Long-Form Question Answering (LFQA) involves generating comprehensive, paragraph-level responses to open-ended questions, which poses a significant challenge for evaluation due to the richness of information and flexible response format. Existing LFQA-evaluation benchmarks often lack reference answers and are limited in size and topic coverage, reducing their reliability. To address this gap, we introduce LFQA-E, a well-constructed, multilingual, and reference-based benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate automatic metrics for LFQA. LFQA-E comprises 1618 questions and 7323 pairwise comparisons across 15 topics, drawn from diverse sources such as online queries and examination questions, thereby enabling a comprehensive assessment of evaluation metrics. We examine five categories of metrics, encompassing 17 specific methods, using LFQA-E. The results demonstrate that none of the existing automatic metrics perform comparably to human judgments, highlighting their inability to capture the dense information in long-form responses. Furthermore, we present a detailed analysis of the failure cases and the generalization capacity of these metrics, offering insights to guide the future development of LFQA evaluation methods. The benchmark and code are available at https://github.com/YuchenFan48/LFQA-E .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e7eef6dc-d856-450a-ba27-f5dea9ea6a7fBuilds on14
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human PreferenceWei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos et al.ICML 2024 · 1,212 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
- G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
Related papers
- A Critical Evaluation of Evaluations for Long-form Question AnsweringFangyuan Xu, Yixiao Song, Mohit Iyyer, Eunsol ChoiACL 2023 · 25 citations
- An Empirical Study of Evaluating Long-form Question AnsweringNing Xian, Yixing Fan, Ruqing Zhang, Maarten de Rijke et al.SIGIR 2025 · 2 citations
- ProxyQA: An Alternative Framework for Evaluating Long-Form Text Generation with Large Language ModelsHaochen Tan, Zhijiang Guo, Zhan Shi, Lu Xu et al.ACL 2024
- LiteraryQA: Towards Effective Evaluation of Long-document Narrative QATommaso Bonomo, Luca Gioffré, Roberto NavigliEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- QGEval: Benchmarking Multi-dimensional Evaluation for Question GenerationWeiping Fu, Bifan Wei, Jianxiang Hu, Zhongmin Cai et al.EMNLP 2024 · 8 citations
