Your Prompts Are Not Safe: Output-Free Membership Inference via Prompt Vectors in Vision-Language Tuning
Yuran Bian, Xiaohan Zhang, Zhiyuan Yu, Changqing Li, Li Pan
Abstract
Prompt tuning enables Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to efficiently adapt to new tasks through learnable prompt vectors. This naturally raises a question: do these prompts leak private information about their training data? While Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) can quantify this risk, current methods rely on access to model outputs or internal gradients. This limitation prevents a clear assessment of a prompt’s standalone privacy leakage, particularly in deployment scenarios where such information is inaccessible. In this paper, we propose Prompt Intrinsic Privacy Risk Analyzer (PIPRA) to address this gap. As the first output-free MIA, PIPRA leverages open-source pre-trained VLMs to extract features from both prompts and samples within a shared cross-modal semantic space. By employing a contrastive learning-based feature projector to enhance these representations, PIPRA enables a subsequent discriminator to effectively perform membership inference. Extensive experiments across nine benchmark datasets and multiple VLMs show PIPRA achieves an average AUC of 87.58%, significantly outperforming traditional output-dependent methods (77.05%). These findings reveal that prompts pose a substantially greater privacy risk than previously recognized, highlighting the urgent need for prompt-level privacy protection.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e7ecb259-ccc3-4e68-8659-f30968334030Builds on21
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot LearningJean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 6,707 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
Related papers
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Vision-Language ModelsYuke Hu, Zheng Li, Zhihao Liu, Yang Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Quantifying Privacy Risks of Prompts in Visual Prompt LearningYixin Wu, Rui Wen, Michael Backes, Pascal Berrang et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 12 citations
- LOMIA: Label-Only Membership Inference Attacks against Pre-trained Large Vision-Language ModelsYihao Liu, Xinqi Lyu, Dong Wang, Yanjie Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks against Large Vision-Language ModelsZhan Li, Yongtao Wu, Yihang Chen, Francesco Tonin et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 43 citations
- Effective Code Membership Inference for Code Completion Models via Adversarial PromptsYuan Jiang, Zehao Li, Shan Huang, Christoph Treude et al.ASE 2025 · 1 citation
