Ratio-Variance Regularized Policy Optimization
Yu Luo, Shuo Han, Yihan Hu, Lei Lv, Huaping Liu, Fuchun Sun, Jianye Hao, Dong Li
Abstract
Standard on-policy reinforcement learning relies on heuristic clipping to enforce trust regions, but this mechanism imposes a severe cost by indiscriminately truncating high-return yet high-divergence updates. We demonstrate that explicitly constraining the policy ratio variance provides a principled local approximation to trust-region constraints, eliminating the need for binary hard clipping. By acting as a distributional ''soft brake'', this approach preserves critical gradient signals from novel discoveries while naturally down-weighting and enabling the reuse of stale, off-policy data. We introduce RVPO (Ratio-Variance Regularized Policy Optimization), which implements this constraint via a primal–dual optimization framework. Extensive evaluations across LLM scales, spanning both fast and slow reasoning paradigms, and robotic control tasks demonstrate the generality of the proposed approach. RVPO achieves substantial performance gains on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, with particularly pronounced improvements on smaller models, while significantly improving sample efficiency. Furthermore, it consistently outperforms PPO baselines in continuous control domains, particularly in sparse-reward and dynamic environments. Together, these findings establish ratio-variance regularization as a principled foundation for stable and data-efficient policy optimization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e7906b6d-2af2-48d0-9e91-3f1489452b6fBuilds on9
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Fine-Tuning Large Vision-Language Models as Decision-Making Agents via Reinforcement LearningSimon Zhai, Hao Bai, Zipeng Lin, Jiayi Pan et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 214 citations
- What Can RL Bring to VLA Generalization? An Empirical StudyJijia Liu, Feng Gao, Bingwen Wei, Xinlei Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 120 citations
Related papers
- QUATRO: Query-Adaptive Trust Region Policy Optimization for LLM Fine-tuningDoyeon Lee, Eunyi Lyou, Hyunsoo Cho, Soo Kyung Kim et al.ICML 2026
- Learning to Constrain Policy Optimization with Virtual Trust RegionHung Le, Thommen Karimpanal George, Majid Abdolshah, Dung Nguyen et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 5 citations
- MRPO: Magnitude-Regularized Policy Optimization via L1 ConstraintsWei Han, Yuanxing Liu, Mingda Li, Ruiyu Xiao et al.ICML 2026
- Prosperity before Collapse: How Far Can Off-Policy RL Reach with Stale Data on LLMs?Haizhong Zheng, Jiawei Zhao, Beidi ChenICLR 2026 · 57 citations
- Optimizing Anytime Reasoning via Budget Relative Policy OptimizationPenghui Qi, Zichen Liu, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 29 citations
