Formal Verification of Quantum Ancilla Safety
Jiqi Li, Jingyi Mei, Wang Fang, Ji Guan
Abstract
Abstract Ensuring ancilla safety is a critical correctness requirement for quantum compilation, since ancilla qubits are routinely introduced to implement complex operations with fewer gates and reduced depth. However, formally verifying this property is computationally hard due to state-space explosion in the number of qubits, particularly for dirty ancillae, which carry unknown initial states and must be restored after use. We propose an end-to-end verification-and-repair framework that rigorously addresses both clean and dirty ancilla safety. Our core contribution is a two-step reduction strategy: we first prove that verifying an m -qubit dirty ancilla register decomposes into 2 m independent clean ancilla safety checks; subsequently, we reduce each clean ancilla safety instance to an algebraic commutativity check against Pauli- Z and Pauli- X operators. This approach yields an efficient and naturally parallel verifier and enables actionable diagnosis by classifying violations into logic errors and phase errors. Leveraging this diagnosis, we further design lightweight repair routines that append local single-qubit rotations to eliminate a broad class of local ancilla faults. We implement the full pipeline in a prototype tool using a dual-backend architecture combining decision diagrams and weighted model counting, and validate it on diverse circuits ranging from arithmetic benchmarks to Grover’s algorithm. Our experiments demonstrate scalability to thousands of qubits and show that the proposed repairs effectively improve ancilla safety while preserving circuit functionality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e76ccbfb-0c20-4cf4-80da-8b0792ba04e8Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Silq: a high-level quantum language with safe uncomputation and intuitive semanticsBenjamin Bichsel, Maximilian Baader, Timon Gehr, Martin T. VechevPLDI 2020 · 145 citations
- Unqomp: synthesizing uncomputation in Quantum circuitsAnouk Paradis, Benjamin Bichsel, Samuel Steffen, Martin T. VechevPLDI 2021 · 34 citations
- Simulating Quantum Circuits by Model CountingJingyi Mei, Marcello M. Bonsangue, Alfons LaarmanCAV 2024 · 15 citations
- Parameterized Verification of Quantum CircuitsParosh Aziz Abdulla, Yu-Fang Chen, Michal Hecko, Lukás Holík et al.POPL 2026 · 3 citations
- Borrowing Dirty Qubits in Quantum ProgramsBonan Su, Li Zhou, Yuan Feng, Mingsheng YingASPLOS 2026 · 1 citation
Related papers
- An Automata-Based Framework for Verification and Bug Hunting in Quantum CircuitsYu-Fang Chen, Kai-Min Chung, Ondrej Lengál, Jyun-Ao Lin et al.PLDI 2023 · 41 citations
- Embedding Quantum Program Verification into DafnyFeifei Cheng, Sushen Vangeepuram, Henry Allard, Seyed Mohammad Reza Jafari et al.OOPSLA 2025 · 2 citations
- Compiling Conditional Quantum Gates without Using Helper QubitsKeli Huang, Jens PalsbergPLDI 2024 · 5 citations
- Optimizing Ancilla-Based Quantum Circuits with SPARERitvik Sharma, Sara AchourPLDI 2025
- A Practical Specification Language for Automatic Quantum Program VerificationWei-Lun Tsai, Yu-Fang Chen, Ondrej LengálCAV 2026
