CrAM: Credibility-Aware Attention Modification in LLMs for Combating Misinformation in RAG
Boyi Deng, Wenjie Wang, Fengbin Zhu, Qifan Wang, Fuli Feng
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can alleviate hallucinations of Large Language Models (LLMs) by referencing external documents. However, the misinformation in external documents may mislead LLMs' generation. To address this issue, we explore the task of "credibility-aware RAG", in which LLMs automatically adjust the influence of retrieved documents based on their credibility scores to counteract misinformation. To this end, we introduce a plug-and-play method named Credibility-aware Attention Modification (CrAM). CrAM identifies influential attention heads in LLMs and adjusts their attention weights based on the credibility of the documents, thereby reducing the impact of low-credibility documents. Experiments on Natual Questions and TriviaQA using Llama2-13B, Llama3-8B, and Qwen1.5-7B show that CrAM improves the RAG performance of LLMs against misinformation pollution by over 20%, even surpassing supervised fine-tuning methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e7665a4d-985c-4ea0-8f8e-6b646428b0a5Cited by top-tier papers9
- ReliabilityRAG: Effective and Provably Robust Defense for RAG-based Web-SearchZeyu Shen, Basileal Imana, Tong Wu, Chong Xiang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 26 citations
- OpenDecoder: Open Large Language Model Decoding to Incorporate Document Quality in RAGFengran Mo, Zhan Su, Yuchen Hui, Jinghan Zhang et al.WWW 2026 · 8 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Estimation of Source ReliabilityJeongyeon Hwang, Junyoung Park, Hyejin Park, Dongwoo Kim et al.EMNLP 2025 · 6 citations
- Tunable LLM-based Proactive Recommendation AgentMingze Wang, Chongming Gao, Wenjie Wang, Yangyang Li et al.ACL 2025 · 4 citations
- GETReason: Enhancing Image Context Extraction through Hierarchical Multi-Agent ReasoningShikhhar Siingh, Abhinav Rawat, Chitta Baral, Vivek GuptaACL 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on5
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant ContextOri Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ori Ram, Jonathan BerantICLR 2024 · 361 citations
- Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 270 citations
- Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question AnsweringVladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis et al.EMNLP 2020 · 142 citations
- Towards Reliable Misinformation Mitigation: Generalization, Uncertainty, and GPT-4Kellin Pelrine, Anne Imouza, Camille Thibault, Meilina Reksoprodjo et al.EMNLP 2023 · 27 citations
Related papers
- Not All Contexts Are Equal: Teaching LLMs Credibility-aware GenerationRuotong Pan, Boxi Cao, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- ATM: Adversarial Tuning Multi-agent System Makes a Robust Retrieval-Augmented GeneratorJunda Zhu, Lingyong Yan, Haibo Shi, Dawei Yin et al.EMNLP 2024 · 6 citations
- Parameters vs. Context: Fine-Grained Control of Knowledge Reliance in Language ModelsBaolong Bi, Shenghua Liu, Yiwei Wang, Yilong Xu et al.ICLR 2026 · 47 citations
- To Trust or Not to Trust? Enhancing Large Language Models' Situated Faithfulness to External ContextsYukun Huang, Sanxing Chen, Hongyi Cai, Bhuwan DhingraICLR 2025
- Measuring and Enhancing Trustworthiness of LLMs in RAG through Grounded Attributions and Learning to RefuseMaojia Song, Shang Hong Sim, Rishabh Bhardwaj, Hai Leong Chieu et al.ICLR 2025
