To type or to speak? The effect of input modality on text understanding during note-taking
Anam Ahmad Khan, Sadia Nawaz, Joshua Newn, Ryan M. Kelly, Jason M. Lodge, James Bailey, Eduardo Velloso
Abstract
Though recent technological advances have enabled note-taking through different modalities (e.g., keyboard, digital ink, voice), there is still a lack of understanding of the effect of the modality choice on learning. In this paper, we compared two note-taking input modalities—keyboard and voice—to study their effects on participants’ understanding of learning content. We conducted a study with 60 participants in which they were asked to take notes using voice or keyboard on two independent digital text passages while also making a judgment about their performance on an upcoming test. We built mixed-effects models to examine the effect of the note-taking modality on learners’ text comprehension, the content of notes and their meta-comprehension judgement. Our findings suggest that taking notes using voice leads to a higher conceptual understanding of the text when compared to typing the notes. We also found that using voice triggers generative processes that result in learners taking more elaborate and comprehensive notes. The findings of the study imply that note-taking tools designed for digital learning environments could incorporate voice as an input modality to promote effective note-taking and higher conceptual understanding of the text.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get e7110cbf-24a6-4499-9ba9-ca6913dff687Cited by top-tier papers4
- GazeNoter: Co-Piloted AR Note-Taking via Gaze Selection of LLM Suggestions to Match Users' IntentionsHsin-Ruey Tsai, Shih-Kang Chiu, Bryan WangCHI 2025 · 8 citations
- "Did you sleep well?": A Multimodal Sleep Diary for Sustained Self-Reporting by ChildrenShanshan Chen, Jun Hu, Hannah Christina van Iterson, Ning Fang et al.CHI 2025 · 3 citations
- Speech vs. Transcript: Does It Matter for Human Annotators in Speech Summarization?Roshan Sharma, Suwon Shon, Mark Lindsey, Hira Dhamyal et al.ACL 2024 · 2 citations
- Enhancing Response Quality by Children in Voice-based Sleep Diaries via AI-based Continuous FeedbackShanshan Chen, Jun Hu, Gubing Wang, Panos MarkopoulosCHI 2026 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Vocalizing User Feedback: The Impact of Input Modality on Self-DisclosureMarc Christopher Grau, Dominic Sieber, Naim Zierau, Ivo BlohmCSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Investigating Representation of Text and Audio in Educational VR using Learning Outcomes and EEGSarune Baceviciute, Aske Mottelson, Thomas Terkildsen, Guido MakranskyCHI 2020 · 79 citations
- Live Sketchnoting Across Platforms: Exploring the Potential and Limitations of Analogue and Digital ToolsMarina Fernández Camporro, Nicolai MarquardtCHI 2020 · 18 citations
- Integrating Gaze and Speech for Enabling Implicit InteractionsAnam Ahmad Khan, Joshua Newn, James Bailey, Eduardo VellosoCHI 2022 · 16 citations
- Typist Experiment: an Investigation of Human-to-Human Dictation via Role-play to Inform Voice-based Text AuthoringCan Liu, Siying Hu, Li Feng, Mingming FanCSCW 2022 · 7 citations
