Scaphy: Detecting Modern ICS Attacks by Correlating Behaviors in SCADA and PHYsical
Moses Ike, Kandy Phan, Keaton Sadoski, Romuald Valme, Wenke Lee
Abstract
Modern Industrial Control Systems (ICS) attacks evade existing tools by using knowledge of ICS processes to blend their activities with benign Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) operation, causing physical world damages. We present Scaphy to detect ICS attacks in SCADA by leveraging the unique execution phases of SCADA to identify the limited set of legitimate behaviors to control the physical world in different phases, which differentiates from attacker’s activities. For example, it is typical for SCADA to setup ICS device objects during initialization, but anomalous during process-control. To extract unique behaviors of SCADA execution phases, Scaphy first leverages open ICS conventions to generate a novel physical process dependency and impact graph (PDIG) to identify disruptive physical states. Scaphy then uses PDIG to inform a physical process-aware dynamic analysis, whereby code paths of SCADA process-control execution is induced to reveal API call behaviors unique to legitimate process-control phases. Using this established behavior, Scaphy selectively monitors attacker’s physical world-targeted activities that violates legitimate process-control behaviors. We evaluated Scaphy at a U.S. national lab ICS testbed environment. Using diverse ICS deployment scenarios and attacks across 4 ICS industries, Scaphy achieved 95% accuracy & 3.5% false positives (FP), compared to 47.5% accuracy and 25% FP of existing work. We analyze Scaphy’s resilience to futuristic attacks where attacker knows our approach.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e6823c11-b246-47ef-8ca5-e538dc4c7ec4Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- QSYM : A Practical Concolic Execution Engine Tailored for Hybrid FuzzingInsu Yun, Sangho Lee, Meng Xu, Yeongjin Jang et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 537 citations
- Limiting the Impact of Stealthy Attacks on Industrial Control SystemsDavid I. Urbina, Jairo Alonso Giraldo, Alvaro A. Cárdenas, Nils Ole Tippenhauer et al.CCS 2016 · 351 citations
- BlackIoT: IoT Botnet of High Wattage Devices Can Disrupt the Power GridSaleh Soltan, Prateek Mittal, H. Vincent PoorUSENIX Security 2018 · 348 citations
- Hey, My Malware Knows Physics! Attacking PLCs with Physical Model Aware RootkitLuis Garcia, Ferdinand Brasser, Mehmet Hazar Cintuglu, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi et al.NDSS 2017 · 205 citations
- Truth Will Out: Departure-Based Process-Level Detection of Stealthy Attacks on Control SystemsWissam Aoudi, Mikel Iturbe, Magnus AlmgrenCCS 2018 · 110 citations
Related papers
- ICSREF: A Framework for Automated Reverse Engineering of Industrial Control Systems BinariesAnastasis Keliris, Michail ManiatakosNDSS 2019 · 90 citations
- Fuzzing the Physical Space: Physics-Aware Testing of Black-Box Industrial Control SystemsBurak Sahin, David Oygenblik, Mingxuan Yao, Yizhi Huang et al.S&P 2026 · 3 citations
- RuleTwin: Physics-Constrained Rule Induction for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Multivariate Time SerieJingzheng Mao, Runjie Pu, Zhen Song, Yanbin Sun et al.KDD 2026
- Towards Automated Safety Vetting of PLC Code in Real-World PlantsMu Zhang, Chien-Ying Chen, Bin-Chou Kao, Yassine Qamsane et al.S&P 2019 · 64 citations
- A Systematic Framework to Generate Invariants for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control SystemsCheng Feng, Venkata Reddy Palleti, Aditya Mathur, Deeph ChanaNDSS 2019 · 135 citations
