Peak-Return Greedy Slicing: Subtrajectory Selection for Transformer-based Offline RL
Zhiwei Xu, Miduo Cui, Dapeng Li, Zhihao Liu, Haifeng Zhang, Hangyu Mao, Guoliang Fan, Bin Zhang
Abstract
Offline reinforcement learning enables policy learning solely from fixed datasets, without costly or risky environment interactions, making it highly valuable for real-world applications. While Transformer-based approaches have recently demonstrated strong sequence modeling capabilities, they typically learn from complete trajectories conditioned on final returns. To mitigate this limitation, we propose the Peak-Return Greedy Slicing (PRGS) framework, which explicitly partitions trajectories at the timestep level and emphasizes high-quality subtrajectories. PRGS first leverages an MMD-based return estimator to characterize the distribution of future returns for state-action pairs, yielding optimistic return estimates. It then performs greedy slicing to extract high-quality subtrajectories for training. During evaluation, an adaptive history truncation mechanism is introduced to align the inference process with the training procedure. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmark datasets indicate that PRGS significantly improves the performance of Transformer-based offline reinforcement learning methods by effectively enhancing their ability to exploit and recombine valuable subtrajectories.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on22
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
Related papers
- Reinformer: Max-Return Sequence Modeling for Offline RLZifeng Zhuang, Dengyun Peng, Jinxin Liu, Ziqi Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 29 citations
- Q-value Regularized Transformer for Offline Reinforcement LearningShengchao Hu, Ziqing Fan, Chaoqin Huang, Li Shen et al.ICML 2024 · 34 citations
- Bootstrapped Transformer for Offline Reinforcement LearningKerong Wang, Hanye Zhao, Xufang Luo, Kan Ren et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 54 citations
- Q-learning Decision Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Programming for Conditional Sequence Modelling in Offline RLTaku Yamagata, Ahmed Khalil, Raúl Santos-RodríguezICML 2023 · 121 citations
- Rethinking Decision Transformer via Hierarchical Reinforcement LearningYi Ma, Jianye Hao, Hebin Liang, Chenjun XiaoICML 2024 · 15 citations
