Constrained Latent Action Policies for Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning
Marvin Alles, Philip Becker-Ehmck, Patrick van der Smagt, Maximilian Karl
Abstract
In offline reinforcement learning, a policy is learned using a static dataset in the absence of costly feedback from the environment. In contrast to the online setting, only using static datasets poses additional challenges, such as policies generating out-of-distribution samples. Model-based offline reinforcement learning methods try to overcome these by learning a model of the underlying dynamics of the environment and using it to guide policy search. It is beneficial but, with limited datasets, errors in the model and the issue of value overestimation among out-of-distribution states can worsen performance. Current model-based methods apply some notion of conservatism to the Bellman update, often implemented using uncertainty estimation derived from model ensembles. In this paper, we propose Constrained Latent Action Policies (C-LAP) which learns a generative model of the joint distribution of observations and actions. We cast policy learning as a constrained objective to always stay within the support of the latent action distribution, and use the generative capabilities of the model to impose an implicit constraint on the generated actions. Thereby eliminating the need to use additional uncertainty penalties on the Bellman update and significantly decreasing the number of gradient steps required to learn a policy. We empirically evaluate C-LAP on the D4RL and V-D4RL benchmark, and show that C-LAP is competitive to state-of-the-art methods, especially outperforming on datasets with visual observations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e5882796-eeb1-4fb6-b0d1-6681ab76e58eCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent ImaginationDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, Mohammad NorouziICLR 2020 · 1,852 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
- Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior SynthesisMichael Janner, Yilun Du, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Sergey LevineICML 2022 · 1,115 citations
Related papers
- Model-Bellman Inconsistency for Model-based Offline Reinforcement LearningYihao Sun, Jiaji Zhang, Chengxing Jia, Haoxin Lin et al.ICML 2023 · 61 citations
- SeMOPO: Learning High-quality Model and Policy from Low-quality Offline Visual DatasetsShenghua Wan, Ziyuan Chen, Le Gan, Shuai Feng et al.ICML 2024 · 1 citation
- Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-EnsembleGaon An, Seungyong Moon, Jang-Hyun Kim, Hyun Oh SongNeurIPS 2021 · 430 citations
- Reasoning with Latent Diffusion in Offline Reinforcement LearningSiddarth Venkatraman, Shivesh Khaitan, Ravi Tej Akella, John M. Dolan et al.ICLR 2024 · 39 citations
- Double Check Your State Before Trusting It: Confidence-Aware Bidirectional Offline Model-Based ImaginationJiafei Lyu, Xiu Li, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 35 citations
