The TAC Toolkit: Supporting Design for User Acceptance of Health Technologies from a Macro-Temporal Perspective
Camille Nadal, Shane McCully, Kevin Doherty, Corina Sas, Gavin Doherty
Abstract
User acceptance is key for the successful uptake and use of health technologies, but also impacted by numerous factors not always easily accessible nor operationalised by designers in practice. This work seeks to facilitate the application of acceptance theory in design practice through the Technology Acceptance (TAC) toolkit: a novel theory-based design tool and method comprising 16 cards, 3 personas, 3 scenarios, a virtual think-space, and a website, which we evaluated through workshops conducted with 21 designers of health technologies. Findings showed that the toolkit revised and extended designers’ knowledge of technology acceptance, fostered their appreciation, empathy and ethical values while designing for acceptance, and contributed towards shaping their future design practice. We discuss implications for considering user acceptance a dynamic, multi-stage process in design practice, and better supporting designers in imagining distant acceptance challenges. Finally, we examine the generative value of the TAC toolkit and its possible future evolution.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e576e949-e256-4d01-8892-d89375467f19Cited by top-tier papers4
- What is in the Cards: Exploring Uses, Patterns, and Trends in Design CardsGary Hsieh, Brett A. Halperin, Evan Schmitz, Yen Nee Chew et al.CHI 2023 · 46 citations
- Designing a Card-Based Design Tool to Bridge Academic Research & Design Practice For Societal ResilienceNovia Nurain, Chia-Fang Chung, Clara Marques Caldeira, Kay ConnellyCHI 2024 · 16 citations
- "It Looks Sexy but it's Wrong." Tensions in Creativity and Accuracy using genAI for Biomedical VisualizationRoxanne Ziman, Shehryar Saharan, Gaël McGill, Laura A. GarrisonIEEE VIS 2025 · 2 citations
- Sociotechnical Challenge Modeling: A Design Method for Responsible AI in Healthcare and Social WelfareTyler Reinmund, Lars Kunze, Marina Denise JirotkaCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on4
- Expanding Modes of Reflection in Design FuturingSandjar Kozubaev, Chris Elsden, Noura Howell, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard et al.CHI 2020 · 171 citations
- Interoceptive Interaction: An Embodied Metaphor Inspired Approach to Designing for MeditationClaudia Daudén Roquet, Corina SasCHI 2021 · 55 citations
- Supporting Stimulation Needs in Dementia Care through Wall-Sized DisplaysCorina Sas, Nigel Davies, Sarah Clinch, Peter Shaw et al.CHI 2020 · 42 citations
- Sensitizing Scenarios: Sensitizing Designer Teams to TheoryAnnika Waern, Paulina Rajkowska, Karin B. Johansson, Jon Back et al.CHI 2020 · 31 citations
Related papers
- "They don't always think about that": Translational Needs in the Design of Personal Health Informatics ApplicationsSusanne Kirchner, Jessica Schroeder, James Fogarty, Sean A. MunsonCHI 2021 · 17 citations
- A Stakeholder Value Framework for Augmentative and Alternative CommunicationAnnuska Zolyomi, Varsha Koushik, Dinara Asyet, Linh H. HuynhCHI 2025 · 1 citation
- A Feminist Care Ethics Toolkit for Community-Based Design: Bridging Theory and PracticeAna O. Henriques, Anna R. L. Carter, Beatriz Severes, Reem Talhouk et al.CHI 2025 · 27 citations
- "It Seems Every Word They Say Has a Purpose": A Social-technical Perspective to Understand the Dynamics between University Students and Mental Health Professionals CSCW025Yujie Li, Baihui Chen, Yuxuan Xu, Bin Cheng et al.CSCW 2026
- "When the Beeping Stops, you Completely Freak Out" - How Acute Care Teams Experience and Use TechnologyAnna Hohm, Oliver Happel, Jörn Hurtienne, Tobias GrundgeigerCSCW 2023 · 11 citations
