Improved Regret Bounds for Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound in Bayesian Optimization
Shogo Iwazaki
Abstract
This paper addresses the Bayesian optimization problem (also referred to as the Bayesian setting of the Gaussian process bandit), where the learner seeks to minimize the regret under a function drawn from a known Gaussian process (GP). Under a Matérn kernel with a certain degree of smoothness, we show that the Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) algorithm achieves 𝑂 ( √ 𝑇) cumulative regret with high probability. Furthermore, our analysis yields 𝑂 ( √︁ 𝑇 ln 2 𝑇) regret under a squared exponential kernel. These results fill the gap between the existing regret upper bound for GP-UCB and the best-known bound provided by Scarlett [46]. The key idea in our proof is to capture the concentration behavior of the input sequence realized by GP-UCB, enabling a more refined analysis of the GP's information gain.
𝑇 ln 𝑇) cumulative regret. Then, the natural question is whether there is further room for improvement in the existing regret upper bound of GP-UCB. This paper provides an affirmative answer to this question by showing that GP-UCB achieves 𝑂 ( √ 𝑇) regret with high probability.
Contribution. We summarize our contributions as follows.
• We show that the GP-UCB proposed by Srinivas et al. [51] achieves 𝑂 ( √ 𝑇) regret with high probability under a Matérn kernel with a certain degree of smoothness (precise condition is provided in Theorem 3). Here, 𝑂 (•) is the order notation that hides polylogarithmic dependence. This result is comparable to state-of-the-art 𝑂 ( √ 𝑇 ln 𝑇) regret provided by Scarlett [46] up to a polylogarithmic factor and strictly improves upon the existing 𝑂 (𝑇 𝜈+𝑑 2𝜈+𝑑 ) upper bound of GP-UCB [51,58]. Here, 𝑑 and 𝜈 denote the dimension of the input domain and smoothness parameter, respectively.
39th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2025).
The existing theory of GP-UCB under the Bayesian setting utilizes the regularity conditions of the realized sample path of GP. We summarize the existing known properties of the GP sample path in the following lemmas. Lemma 1 (Lipchitz condition of sample path, e.g., [51]). Suppose 𝑘 = 𝑘 SE or 𝑘 = 𝑘 Matérn with 𝜈 > 2. Assume Assumption 1. Then, there exist the constants 𝑎, 𝑏 > 0 such that
Lemma 2 (Sample path condition for the global maximizer, e.g., [13,14,46]). Suppose 𝑘 = 𝑘 SE or 𝑘 = 𝑘 Matérn with 𝜈 > 2. Assume Assumption 1. Then, for any 𝛿 GP ∈ (0, 1), there exist the strictly positive constants 𝑐 gap , 𝑐 sup , 𝑐 quad , 𝜌 quad > 0 such that the following statements simultaneously hold with probability at least 1 -𝛿 GP :
- The function 𝑓 has a unique maximizer x * ∈ X such that 𝑓 (x * ) > 𝑓 ( x * ) + 𝑐 gap holds for any local maximizer x * ∈ X of 𝑓 .
√ 𝑇), while it is strictly smaller than 𝑂 (𝑇 𝜈+𝑑 2𝜈+𝑑 ) of the original GP-UCB's analysis.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e551ac58-a97a-42cf-bf6e-67488fd0f87bCited by top-tier papers4
- Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound Achieves Nearly-Optimal Regret in Noise-Free Gaussian Process BanditsShogo IwazakiNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Tighter Regret Lower Bound for Gaussian Process Bandits with Squared Exponential Kernel in HypersphereShogo IwazakiICML 2026 · 5 citations
- Convergence Rates of Constrained Expected ImprovementHaowei Wang, Jingyi Wang, Zhongxiang Dai, Naiyuan Chiang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- On Regret Bounds of Thompson Sampling for Bayesian OptimizationShion Takeno, Shogo IwazakiICML 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on12
- On the Similarity between the Laplace and Neural Tangent KernelsAmnon Geifman, Abhay Kumar Yadav, Yoni Kasten, Meirav Galun et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 118 citations
- Optimal Order Simple Regret for Gaussian Process BanditsSattar Vakili, Nacime Bouziani, Sepehr Jalali, Alberto Bernacchia et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 70 citations
- High-dimensional Experimental Design and Kernel BanditsRomain Camilleri, Kevin Jamieson, Julian Katz-SamuelsICML 2021 · 63 citations
- Gaussian Process Uniform Error Bounds with Unknown Hyperparameters for Safety-Critical ApplicationsAlexandre Capone, Armin Lederer, Sandra HircheICML 2022 · 26 citations
- Randomized Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound with Tighter Bayesian Regret BoundsShion Takeno, Yu Inatsu, Masayuki KarasuyamaICML 2023 · 24 citations
Related papers
- On the Sublinear Regret of GP-UCBJustin Whitehouse, Aaditya Ramdas, Zhiwei Steven WuNeurIPS 2023 · 35 citations
- Quantum Bayesian OptimizationZhongxiang Dai, Gregory Kang Ruey Lau, Arun Verma, Yao Shu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 22 citations
- Regret Bounds for Gaussian-Process Optimization in Large DomainsManuel Wüthrich, Bernhard Schölkopf, Andreas KrauseNeurIPS 2021 · 8 citations
- Active Set OrderingQuoc Phong Nguyen, Sunil Gupta, Svetha Venkatesh, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation
- Random Exploration in Bayesian Optimization: Order-Optimal Regret and Computational EfficiencySudeep Salgia, Sattar Vakili, Qing ZhaoICML 2024 · 13 citations
