Learning to Schedule Heuristics in Branch and Bound
Antonia Chmiela, Elias B. Khalil, Ambros M. Gleixner, Andrea Lodi, Sebastian Pokutta
Abstract
Primal heuristics play a crucial role in exact solvers for Mixed Integer Programming (MIP). While solvers are guaranteed to find optimal solutions given sufficient time, real-world applications typically require finding good solutions early on in the search to enable fast decision-making. While much of MIP research focuses on designing effective heuristics, the question of how to manage multiple MIP heuristics in a solver has not received equal attention. Generally, solvers follow hard-coded rules derived from empirical testing on broad sets of instances. Since the performance of heuristics is instance-dependent, using these general rules for a particular problem might not yield the best performance. In this work, we propose the first data-driven framework for scheduling heuristics in an exact MIP solver. By learning from data describing the performance of primal heuristics, we obtain a problem-specific schedule of heuristics that collectively find many solutions at minimal cost. We provide a formal description of the problem and propose an efficient algorithm for computing such a schedule. Compared to the default settings of a state-of-the-art academic MIP solver, we are able to reduce the average primal integral by up to 49% on a class of challenging instances.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e4a107b9-5f82-476f-97ca-b98ed176cc84Cited by top-tier papers23
- DeepACO: Neural-enhanced Ant Systems for Combinatorial OptimizationHaoran Ye, Jiarui Wang, Zhiguang Cao, Helan Liang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 158 citations
- Learning to Branch with Tree MDPsLara Scavuzzo, Feng Yang Chen, Didier Chételat, Maxime Gasse et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 88 citations
- MIP-GNN: A Data-Driven Framework for Guiding Combinatorial SolversElias B. Khalil, Christopher Morris, Andrea LodiAAAI 2022 · 75 citations
- Learning to Compare Nodes in Branch and Bound with Graph Neural NetworksAbdel Ghani Labassi, Didier Chételat, Andrea LodiNeurIPS 2022 · 53 citations
- Searching Large Neighborhoods for Integer Linear Programs with Contrastive LearningTaoan Huang, Aaron M. Ferber, Yuandong Tian, Bistra Dilkina et al.ICML 2023 · 45 citations
Related papers
- L2P-MIP: Learning to Presolve for Mixed Integer ProgrammingChang Liu, Zhichen Dong, Haobo Ma, Weilin Luo et al.ICLR 2024 · 10 citations
- Learning to Configure Separators in Branch-and-CutSirui Li, Wenbin Ouyang, Max B. Paulus, Cathy WuNeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
- Accelerating Primal Solution Findings for Mixed Integer Programs Based on Solution PredictionJian-Ya Ding, Chao Zhang, Lei Shen, Shengyin Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 119 citations
- Learning To Dive In Branch And BoundMax B. Paulus, Andreas KrauseNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Sample Complexity of Algorithm Selection Using Neural Networks and Its Applications to Branch-and-CutHongyu Cheng, Sammy Khalife, Barbara Fiedorowicz, Amitabh BasuNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
