USENIX Security2024Top-tier venue
Smudged Fingerprints: Characterizing and Improving the Performance of Web Application Fingerprinting
Brian Kondracki, Nick Nikiforakis
Abstract
Open-source web applications have given everyone the ability to deploy complex web applications on their site(s), ranging from blogs and personal clouds, to server administration tools and webmail clients. Given that there exists millions of deployments of this software in the wild, the ability to fingerprint a particular release of a web application residing at a web endpoint is of interest to both attackers and defenders alike. In this work, we study modern web application fingerprinting techniques and identify their inherent strengths and weaknesses. We design WASABO, a web application testing framework and use it to measure the performance of six web application fingerprinting tools against 1,360 releases of popular web applications. While 94.8% of all web application releases were correctly labeled by at least one fingerprinting tool in ideal conditions, many tools are unable to produce a single version prediction for a particular release. This leads to instances where a release is labeled as multiple disparate versions, resulting in administrator confusion on the security posture of an unknown web application. We also measure the accuracy of each tool against realworld deployments of the studied web applications, observing up to an 80% drop-off in performance compared to our offline results. To identify causes for this performance degradation, as well as to improve the robustness of these tools in the wild, we design a web-application-agnostic middleware which applies a series of transformations to the traffic of each fingerprinting tool. Overall, we are able to improve the performance of popular web application fingerprinting tools by up to 22.9%, without any modification to the evaluated tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e49a8e55-b1b6-4e99-b3ef-63abacb5043dCited by top-tier papers2
- Beyond Exploit Scanning: A Functional Change-Driven Approach to Remote Software Version IdentificationJinsong Chen, Mengying Wu, Geng Hong, Baichao An et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Who's to Blame? Rethinking the Brittleness of Automated Web GUI Testing from a Pragmatic PerspectiveHaonan Zhang, Kundi Yao, Zishuo Ding, Lizhi Liao et al.ASE 2025
Builds on3
- Online Tracking: A 1-million-site Measurement and AnalysisSteven Englehardt, Arvind NarayananCCS 2016 · 798 citations
- ReScan: A Middleware Framework for Realistic and Robust Black-box Web Application ScanningKostas Drakonakis, Sotiris Ioannidis, Jason PolakisNDSS 2023
- ChargePrint: A Framework for Internet-Scale Discovery and Security Analysis of EV Charging Management SystemsTony Nasr, Sadegh Torabi, Elias Bou-Harb, Claude Fachkha et al.NDSS 2023
Related papers
- Scan Me If You Can: Understanding and Detecting Unwanted Vulnerability ScanningXigao Li, Babak Amin Azad, Amir Rahmati, Nick NikiforakisWWW 2023 · 7 citations
- The Great Request Robbery: An Empirical Study of Client-side Request Hijacking Vulnerabilities on the WebSoheil Khodayari, Thomas Barber, Giancarlo PellegrinoS&P 2024 · 12 citations
- Large-Scale Measurement and Real-World Mitigation of Web Browser Fingerprinting in the WildTom Ritter, Fatih Kilic, Frederik Braun, Elisa Luo et al.CCS 2026
- A Broad Comparative Evaluation of Software Debloating ToolsMichael D. Brown, Adam Meily, Brian Fairservice, Akshay Sood et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 16 citations
- k-fingerprinting: A Robust Scalable Website Fingerprinting TechniqueJamie Hayes, George DanezisUSENIX Security 2016 · 474 citations
