An Improved Privacy and Utility Analysis of Differentially Private SGD with Bounded Domain and Smooth Losses
Hao Liang, Wanrong Zhang, Xinlei He, Kaishun Wu, Hong Xing
Abstract
Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DPSGD) is widely used to protect sensitive data during the training of machine learning models, but its privacy guarantee often comes at a large cost of model performance due to the lack of tight theoretical bounds quantifying privacy loss. While recent efforts have achieved more accurate privacy guarantees, they still impose some assumptions prohibited from practical applications, such as convexity and complex parameter requirements, and rarely investigate in-depth the impact of privacy mechanisms on the model's utility. In this paper, we provide a rigorous privacy characterization for DPSGD with general L-smooth and non-convex loss functions, revealing converged privacy loss with iteration in bounded-domain cases. Specifically, we track the privacy loss over multiple iterations, leveraging the noisy smooth-reduction property, and further establish comprehensive convergence analysis in different scenarios. In particular, we show that for DPSGD with a bounded domain, (i) the privacy loss can still converge without the convexity assumption, (ii) a smaller bounded diameter can improve both privacy and utility simultaneously under certain conditions, and (iii) the attainable big-O order of the privacy utility trade-off for DPSGD with gradient clipping (DPSGD-GC) and for DPSGD-GC with bounded domain (DPSGD-DC) and strongly convex population risk function, respectively. Experiments via membership inference attack (MIA) in a practical setting validate insights gained from the theoretical results.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e4761b7d-09af-4519-84fe-58fb3c3848aaCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Numerical Composition of Differential PrivacySivakanth Gopi, Yin Tat Lee, Lukas WutschitzNeurIPS 2021 · 259 citations
- Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric PerspectiveXiangyi Chen, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Mingyi HongNeurIPS 2020 · 254 citations
- Improved Analysis of Clipping Algorithms for Non-convex OptimizationBohang Zhang, Jikai Jin, Cong Fang, Liwei WangNeurIPS 2020 · 139 citations
Related papers
- Improved Convergence of Differential Private SGD with Gradient ClippingHuang Fang, Xiaoyun Li, Chenglin Fan, Ping LiICLR 2023
- DPSUR: Accelerating Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent Using Selective Update and ReleaseJie Fu, Qingqing Ye, Haibo Hu, Zhili Chen et al.VLDB 2024 · 34 citations
- Closed-Form Bounds for DP-SGD against Record-level InferenceGiovanni Cherubin, Boris Köpf, Andrew Paverd, Shruti Tople et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 2 citations
- Privacy of Noisy Stochastic Gradient Descent: More Iterations without More Privacy LossJason M. Altschuler, Kunal TalwarNeurIPS 2022 · 89 citations
- Eliminating Solution Bias in Differentially Private OptimizationDONGRUN LI, YUN ZENG, Zibo Wei, Jiacheng Wei et al.ICML 2026
