Pointer life cycle types for lock-free data structures with memory reclamation
Roland Meyer, Sebastian Wolff
Abstract
We consider the verification of lock-free data structures that manually manage their memory with the help of a safe memory reclamation (SMR) algorithm. Our first contribution is a type system that checks whether a program properly manages its memory. If the type check succeeds, it is safe to ignore the SMR algorithm and consider the program under garbage collection. Intuitively, our types track the protection of pointers as guaranteed by the SMR algorithm. There are two design decisions. The type system does not track any shape information, which makes it extremely lightweight. Instead, we rely on invariant annotations that postulate a protection by the SMR. To this end, we introduce angels, ghost variables with an angelic semantics. Moreover, the SMR algorithm is not hard-coded but a parameter of the type system definition. To achieve this, we rely on a recent specification language for SMR algorithms. Our second contribution is to automate the type inference and the invariant check. For the type inference, we show a quadratic-time algorithm. For the invariant check, we give a source-to-source translation that links our programs to off-the-shelf verification tools. It compiles away the angelic semantics. This allows us to infer appropriate annotations automatically in a guess-and-check manner. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our type-based verification approach, we check linearizability for various list and set implementations from the literature with both hazard pointers and epoch-based memory reclamation. For many of the examples, this is the first time they are verified automatically. For the ones where there is a competitor, we obtain a speed-up of up to two orders of magnitude.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e3d0e4fd-18e3-4cb6-b590-8820746ccd51Cited by top-tier papers3
- Modular Verification of Safe Memory Reclamation in Concurrent Separation LogicJaehwang Jung, Janggun Lee, Jaemin Choi, Jaewoo Kim et al.OOPSLA 2023 · 10 citations
- A concurrent program logic with a future and historyRoland Meyer, Thomas Wies, Sebastian WolffOOPSLA 2022 · 9 citations
- Arithmetizing Shape AnalysisSebastian Wolff, Ekanshdeep Gupta, Zafer Esen, Hossein Hojjat et al.CAV 2025
Related papers
- Leveraging Immutability to Validate Hazard Pointers for Optimistic TraversalsJanggun Lee, Jeonghyeon Kim, Jeehoon KangPLDI 2025 · 2 citations
- NBR: neutralization based reclamationAjay Singh, Trevor Brown, Ali José MashtizadehPPoPP 2021 · 23 citations
- OrcGC: automatic lock-free memory reclamationAndreia Correia, Pedro Ramalhete, Pascal FelberPPoPP 2021 · 19 citations
- Concurrent Immediate Reference CountingJaehwang Jung, Jeonghyeon Kim, Matthew J. Parkinson, Jeehoon KangPLDI 2024 · 6 citations
- A marriage of pointer- and epoch-based reclamationJeehoon Kang, Jaehwang JungPLDI 2020 · 25 citations
