Investigating Advanced Reasoning of Large Language Models via Black-Box Environment Interaction
Congchi Yin, Tianyi Wu, Yankai Shu, Alex Gu, Yun Wang, Jun Shao, xun jiang, Piji Li
Abstract
Existing tasks fall short in evaluating reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in an interactive, unknown environment. This deficiency leads to the isolated assessment of deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning, neglecting the integrated reasoning process that is indispensable for human-like discovery learning. We introduce a novel evaluation paradigm, black-box environment interaction, to tackle this challenge. A black-box environment is defined by a hidden function that maps a specific set of inputs to outputs. LLMs are required to unravel the hidden function behind the black-box environment by interacting with it in given exploration turns, and reasoning over observed input-output pairs. Leveraging this idea, we build the ORACLE benchmark which comprises 6 types of black-box task with 96 black-box environments. 19 modern LLMs are benchmarked. o3, a leading LLM from OpenAI, ranks first in 5 of the 6 tasks, achieving over 70% accuracy on most easy black-box environments. But it still struggles with some hard black-box tasks, where the average performance drops below 40%. Further analysis reveals a universal difficulty among LLMs: They lack the high-level planning capability to develop efficient and adaptive exploration strategies for hypothesis refinement. Code is available in https://github. com/lemonsis/Oracle_Benchmark .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e3cb16f8-2a5a-4cb4-917e-aa8ef5101b4eBuilds on10
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on CompositionalityNouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar, Xiang Lorraine Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 728 citations
- Abductive Commonsense ReasoningChandra Bhagavatula, Ronan Le Bras, Chaitanya Malaviya, Keisuke Sakaguchi et al.ICLR 2020 · 521 citations
- Chain of Thoughtlessness? An Analysis of CoT in PlanningKaya Stechly, Karthik Valmeekam, Subbarao KambhampatiNeurIPS 2024 · 156 citations
- To the Cutoff... and Beyond? A Longitudinal Perspective on LLM Data ContaminationManley Roberts, Himanshu Thakur, Christine Herlihy, Colin White et al.ICLR 2024 · 45 citations
Related papers
- InductionBench: LLMs Fail in the Simplest Complexity ClassWenyue Hua, Tyler Wong, Fei Sun, Liangming Pan et al.ACL 2025
- From Passive to Active Reasoning: Can Large Language Models Ask the Right Questions under Incomplete Information?Zhanke Zhou, Xiao Feng, Zhaocheng Zhu, Jiangchao Yao et al.ICML 2025
- ACPBench: Reasoning About Action, Change, and PlanningHarsha Kokel, Michael Katz, Kavitha Srinivas, Shirin SohrabiAAAI 2025 · 35 citations
- MME-Reasoning: A Broad-Spectrum Benchmark for Evaluating Logical Reasoning in MLLMsJiakang Yuan, Tianshuo Peng, Yilei Jiang, Yiting Lu et al.ICML 2026
- BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On GamesDavide Paglieri, Bartlomiej Cupial, Samuel Coward, Ulyana Piterbarg et al.ICLR 2025
