Two Modes of Reflection: How Temporal, Spatial, and Social Distances Affect Reflective Writing in Family Caregiving
Shunpei Norihama, Yuka Iwane, Jo Takezawa, Simo Hosio, Mari Hirano, Naomi Yamashita, Koji Yatani
Abstract
Therapeutic writing offers significant benefits for well-being; however, for family caregivers, conventional fixed or userinitiated schedules often fail to align with their dynamic, high-stress reality. We conducted a three-week field study with 47 caregivers using a chatbot that delivered daily reflective writing cues and captured temporal, spatial, and social contexts. Our analysis identified a writing spectrum anchored by two distinct reflective modes. Under psychologically proximal conditions, participants produced detailed, emotion-rich, and care-recipient-focused narratives that supported emotional release. Under distal conditions, they generated calmer, self-focused, and analytic accounts that enabled objective reflection and cognitive reappraisal. Participants described trade-offs: proximity preserved vivid detail but limited objectivity, while distance enabled analysis but risked memory loss. This work contributes empirical evidence of how psychological distances shape reflective writing and proposes design implications for distance-aware Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions for family caregivers' mental health support.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in ubiquitous and mobile computing; Empirical studies in HCI; • Applied computing → Health informatics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e3267572-0012-4215-8481-796cc3e67a0dBuilds on8
- Design of Digital Workplace Stress-Reduction Intervention Systems: Effects of Intervention Type and TimingEsther Howe, Jina Suh, Mehrab Bin Morshed, Daniel McDuff et al.CHI 2022 · 95 citations
- Exploring the State-of-Receptivity for mHealth InterventionsFlorian Künzler, Varun Mishra, Jan-Niklas Kramer, David Kotz et al.UbiComp 2020 · 91 citations
- MindScape Study: Integrating LLM and Behavioral Sensing for Personalized AI-Driven Journaling ExperiencesSubigya Nepal, Arvind Pillai, William Campbell, Talie Massachi et al.UbiComp 2025 · 45 citations
- Dyadic Mirror: Everyday Second-person Live-view for Empathetic Reflection upon Parent-child InteractionWonjung Kim, Seungchul Lee, Seonghoon Kim, Sungbin Jo et al.UbiComp 2020 · 24 citations
- ReVibe: A Context-assisted Evening Recall Approach to Improve Self-report AdherenceMashfiqui Rabbi, Katherine Li, H. Yanna Yan, Kelly Hall et al.UbiComp 2020 · 23 citations
Related papers
- Exploring the Effects of Different Chatbot Voice Identities on Self-DisclosureYamato Mogi, Wataru Akahori, Naomi YamashitaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Understanding Remote Mental Health Supporters' Help-Seeking in Online CommunitiesTuan-He Lee, Gilly LeshedCHI 2026 · 4 citations
- CareJournal: A Voice-Based Conversational Agent for Supporting Care CommunicationsJohn Rudnik, Sharadhi Raghuraj, Mingyi Li, Robin N. BrewerCHI 2024 · 24 citations
- Sharing the Care: Investigating How Conversational AI Might Facilitate Coordination Among Home Care Workers and Family CaregiversIan René Solano-Kamaiko, Ariel C. Avgar, Madeline R. Sterling, Aditya Vashistha et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- "Words are not enough": Examining Emotional Support by Conversational AI for CaregiversMelika Vafafar, Sian Joel-Edgar, Casper Harteveld, Hossein Dabbagh et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
