Optimality of Frequency Moment Estimation
Mark Braverman, Or Zamir
Abstract
Estimating the second frequency moment of a stream up to (1±ε) multiplicative error requires at most O(logn / ε2) bits of space, due to a seminal result of Alon, Matias, and Szegedy. It is also known that at least Ω(logn + 1/ε2) space is needed. We prove a tight lower bound of Ω(log(n ε2 ) / ε2) for all ε = Ω(1/√n). Note that when ε>n−1/2 + c, where c>0, our lower bound matches the classic upper bound of AMS. For smaller values of ε we also introduce a revised algorithm that improves the classic AMS bound and matches our lower bound. Our lower bound holds also for the more general problem of p-th frequency moment estimation for the range of p∈ (1,2], giving a tight bound in the only remaining range to settle the optimal space complexity of estimating frequency moments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on1
Related papers
- Differentially Private Fractional Frequency Moments Estimation with Polylogarithmic SpaceLun Wang, Iosif Pinelis, Dawn SongICLR 2022 · 19 citations
- Frequency Estimation with One-Sided ErrorPiotr Indyk, Shyam Narayanan, David P. WoodruffSODA 2022 · 1 citation
- A Polynomial Space Lower Bound for Diameter Estimation in Dynamic StreamsSanjeev Khanna, Ashwin Padaki, Krish Singal, Erik WaingartenFOCS 2025 · 3 citations
- Tight Space Lower Bound for Pseudo-Deterministic Approximate CountingOfer Grossman, Meghal Gupta, Mark SellkeFOCS 2023 · 1 citation
- Skirting Additive Error Barriers for Private Turnstile StreamsAnders Aamand, Justin Y. Chen, Sandeep SilwalICLR 2026 · 2 citations
