Local Stability of Rankings
Felix S. Campbell, Yuval Moskovitch
Abstract
Rankings play a crucial role in decision-making. However, if minor changes to items significantly alter their rankings, the quality of the decisions being made can be compromised. The stability of ranking is a measure used to assess how modifications to the ranking algorithm or data affect results. While previous work has focused on stability of the ranking under changes to the algorithm, we introduce a novel measure we refer to as local stability . Local stability indicates the effect of minor changes to the values of an item in the ranking on its rank. Our proposed definition furthermore takes into account the presence of multiple items with similar qualities in the ranking, called dense regions, permitting minor modifications to swap the positions of items within the region. We show that computing this measure in general is hard, and in turn propose a relaxation of the definition to admit approximation. We present (i) LStability, a sampling-based algorithm for approximating local stability, on which we make probably-approximately-correct-type guarantees through the use of concentration inequalities, and (ii) Detect-Dense-Region, an algorithm based on this approach to detect the dense region an item lies in, if it exists. We introduce a number of optimizations to our algorithms to improve their scalability and efficiency. We validate our proposed framework through an extensive suite of experiments, including case studies highlighting the utility of our definitions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e2e04d21-7bf4-4df7-9e7b-ea4a03511ef7Builds on11
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- GeCo: Quality Counterfactual Explanations in Real TimeMaximilian Schleich, Zixuan Geng, Yihong Zhang, Dan SuciuVLDB 2021 · 77 citations
- SAFARI: Versatile and Efficient Evaluations for Robustness of InterpretabilityWei Huang, Xingyu Zhao, Gaojie Jin, Xiaowei HuangICCV 2023 · 41 citations
- Scalable Quantitative Verification For Deep Neural NetworksTeodora Baluta, Zheng Leong Chua, Kuldeep S. Meel, Prateek SaxenaICSE 2021 · 39 citations
- Efficient Statistical Assessment of Neural Network Corruption RobustnessKarim Tit, Teddy Furon, Mathias RoussetNeurIPS 2021 · 21 citations
Related papers
- Quantifying Prediction Consistency Under Fine-tuning Multiplicity in Tabular LLMsFaisal Hamman, Pasan Dissanayake, Saumitra Mishra, Freddy Lécué et al.ICML 2025
- Provably Auditing Ordinary Least Squares in Low DimensionsAnkur Moitra, Dhruv RohatgiICLR 2023
- On Sampled Metrics for Item RecommendationWalid Krichene, Steffen RendleKDD 2020 · 459 citations
- Average Sensitivity of Euclidean k-ClusteringYuichi Yoshida, Shinji ItoNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Isotropy and Log-Concave Polynomials: Accelerated Sampling and High-Precision Counting of Matroid BasesNima Anari, Michal DerezinskiFOCS 2020 · 6 citations
