Vision Transformer Neural Architecture Search for Out-of-Distribution Generalization: Benchmark and Insights
Sy-Tuyen Ho, Tuan Van Vo, Somayeh Ebrahimkhani, Ngai-Man Cheung
Abstract
While ViTs have achieved across machine learning tasks, deploying them in real-world scenarios faces a critical challenge: generalizing under OoD shifts. A crucial research gap exists in understanding how to design ViT architectures, both manually and automatically, for better OoD generalization. To this end, we introduce OoD-ViT-NAS, the first systematic benchmark for ViTs NAS focused on OoD generalization. This benchmark includes 3000 ViT architectures of varying computational budgets evaluated on 8 common OoD datasets. Using this benchmark, we analyze factors contributing to OoD generalization. Our findings reveal key insights. First, ViT architecture designs significantly affect OoD generalization. Second, ID accuracy is often a poor indicator of OoD accuracy, highlighting the risk of optimizing ViT architectures solely for ID performance. Third, we perform the first study of NAS for ViTs OoD robustness, analyzing 9 Training-free NAS methods. We find that existing Training-free NAS methods are largely ineffective in predicting OoD accuracy despite excelling at ID accuracy. Simple proxies like Param or Flop surprisingly outperform complex Training-free NAS methods in predicting OoD accuracy. Finally, we study how ViT architectural attributes impact OoD generalization and discover that increasing embedding dimensions generally enhances performance. Our benchmark shows that ViT architectures exhibit a wide range of OoD accuracy, with up to 11.85% improvement for some OoD shifts. This underscores the importance of studying ViT architecture design for OoD. We believe OoD-ViT-NAS can catalyze further research into how ViT designs influence OoD generalization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on54
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationDan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Norman Mu, Saurav Kadavath et al.ICCV 2021 · 2,294 citations
- CrossViT: Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer for Image ClassificationChun-Fu (Richard) Chen, Quanfu Fan, Rameswar PandaICCV 2021 · 2,072 citations
Related papers
- Delving Deep into the Generalization of Vision Transformers under Distribution ShiftsChongzhi Zhang, Mingyuan Zhang, Shanghang Zhang, Daisheng Jin et al.CVPR 2022 · 95 citations
- NAS-OoD: Neural Architecture Search for Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationHaoyue Bai, Fengwei Zhou, Lanqing Hong, Nanyang Ye et al.ICCV 2021 · 46 citations
- Training-free Transformer Architecture SearchQinqin Zhou, Kekai Sheng, Xiawu Zheng, Ke Li et al.CVPR 2022 · 51 citations
- Auto-Prox: Training-Free Vision Transformer Architecture Search via Automatic Proxy DiscoveryZimian Wei, Peijie Dong, Zheng Hui, Anggeng Li et al.AAAI 2024 · 8 citations
- Auto-scaling Vision Transformers without TrainingWuyang Chen, Wei Huang, Xianzhi Du, Xiaodan Song et al.ICLR 2022 · 27 citations
