Above and Beyond: Organizational Efforts to Complement U.S. Digital Security Compliance Mandates
Rock Stevens, Faris Bugra Kokulu, Adam Doupé, Michelle L. Mazurek
Abstract
—Organizations that provide essential services such as electricity, healthcare, and secure financial transactions are required to use digital-security compliance programs to establish a baseline of minimum security. Unfortunately, these compliance programs are known to suffer from a multitude of issues (both in how they are written and in how organizations implement them), resulting in organizations implementing their own security measures to fill actual or perceived compliance gaps. In this study, we survey 40 security professionals from six U.S. essential-service sectors to gain insight into how organizations complement compliance to fix perceived security gaps, which measures worked particularly well, and how their organizations prioritize and evaluate the measures they adopt. We find that organizations complement compliance programs often, with 37 of 40 participants confirming that their organizations have gone beyond what they perceive as mandated compliance measures to mitigate otherwise unaddressed risks. While participants were generally positive about these perceived complementary measures, they also reported challenges related to poor management, information saturation, and difficulty keeping complementary measures up-to-date and relevant. Based on these results, we recommend that compliance standards directly integrate guidance for carefully managing and auditing any perceived complementary measures that an organization chooses to implement and that organizations carefully plan end-to-end deployment and operation before implementing these measures.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e2924f21-baa8-45de-b078-2728293c149fCited by top-tier papers6
- "False negative - that one is going to kill you": Understanding Industry Perspectives of Static Analysis based Security TestingAmit Seal Ami, Kevin Moran, Denys Poshyvanyk, Adwait NadkarniS&P 2024 · 40 citations
- Engaging Company Developers in Security Research Studies: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Quantitative SurveyRaphael Serafini, Stefan Albert Horstmann, Alena NaiakshinaUSENIX Security 2024 · 7 citations
- "Belt and suspenders" or "just red tape"?: Investigating Early Artifacts and User Perceptions of IoT App Security CertificationPrianka Mandal, Amit Seal Ami, Victor Olaiya, Sayyed Hadi Razmjo et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 4 citations
- The Challenges and Opportunities with Cybersecurity Regulations: A Case Study of the US Electric Power SectorSena Sahin, Burak Sahin, Robin Berthier, Kate Davis et al.CCS 2025 · 1 citation
- "We can't Change it Overnight": Understanding Industry Perspectives on IoT Product Security Compliance and CertificationPrianka Mandal, Adwait NadkarniS&P 2025
Builds on9
- NoDoze: Combatting Threat Alert Fatigue with Automated Provenance TriageWajih Ul Hassan, Shengjian Guo, Ding Li, Zhengzhang Chen et al.NDSS 2019 · 411 citations
- Hackers vs. Testers: A Comparison of Software Vulnerability Discovery ProcessesDaniel Votipka, Rock Stevens, Elissa M. Redmiles, Jeremy Hu et al.S&P 2018 · 151 citations
- Matched and Mismatched SOCs: A Qualitative Study on Security Operations Center IssuesFaris Bugra Kokulu, Ananta Soneji, Tiffany Bao, Yan Shoshitaishvili et al.CCS 2019 · 134 citations
- Reading the Tea leaves: A Comparative Analysis of Threat IntelligenceVector Guo Li, Matthew Dunn, Paul Pearce, Damon McCoy et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 123 citations
- Investigating System Operators' Perspective on Security MisconfigurationsConstanze Dietrich, Katharina Krombholz, Kevin Borgolte, Tobias FiebigCCS 2018 · 116 citations
Related papers
- Compliance Cautions: Investigating Security Issues Associated with U.S. Digital-Security StandardsRock Stevens, Josiah Dykstra, Wendy Knox Everette, James Chapman et al.NDSS 2020
- Understanding Legal Professionals' Practices and Expectations in Data Breach Incident ReportingEce Gumusel, Yue Xiao, Yue Qin, Jiaxin Qin et al.CCS 2024
- A Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of Security and Privacy Advice on the WebElissa M. Redmiles, Noel Warford, Amritha Jayanti, Aravind Koneru et al.USENIX Security 2020
- "What Keeps People Secure is That They Met The Security Team": Deconstructing Drivers And Goals of Organizational Security AwarenessJonas Hielscher, Simon ParkinUSENIX Security 2024 · 7 citations
- An Interview Study on Third-Party Cyber Threat Hunting Processes in the U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityWilliam P. Maxam III, James C. DavisUSENIX Security 2024 · 14 citations
