An Extensive Study of Residential Proxies in China
Mingshuo Yang, Yunnan Yu, Xianghang Mi, Shujun Tang, Shanqing Guo, Yilin Li, Xiaofeng Zheng, Haixin Duan
Abstract
We carry out the first in-depth characterization of residential proxies (RESIPs) in China, for which little is studied in previous works. Our study is made possible through a semantic-based classifier to automatically capture RESIP services. In addition to the classifier, new techniques have also been identified to capture RE-SIPs without interacting with and relaying traffic through RESIP services, which can significantly lower the cost and thus allow a continuous monitoring of RESIPs. Our RESIP service classifier has achieved a good performance with a recall of 99.7% and a precision of 97.6% in 10-fold cross validation. Applying the classifier has identified 399 RESIP services, a much larger set compared to 38 RESIP services collected in all previous works. Our effort of RE-SIP capturing lead to a collection of 9,077,278 RESIP IPs (51.36% are located in China), 96.70% of which are not covered in publicly available RESIP datasets. An extensive measurement on RESIPs and their services has uncovered a set of interesting findings as well as several security implications. Especially, 80.05% RESIP IPs located in China have sourced at least one malicious traffic flows during 2021, resulting in 52-million malicious traffic flows in total. And RESIPs have also been observed in corporation networks of 559 sensitive organizations including government agencies, education institutions and enterprises. Also, 3,232,698 China RESIP IPs have opened at least one TCP/UDP ports for accepting relaying requests, which incurs non-negligible security risks to the local network of RESIPs. Besides, 91% China RESIP IPs are of a lifetime less than 10 days while most China RESIP services show up a cresttrough pattern in terms of the daily active RESIPs across time. CCS Concepts • Security and privacy → Web protocol security.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Understanding the Mirai BotnetManos Antonakakis, Tim April, Michael D. Bailey, Matt Bernhard et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 2,003 citations
- Tranco: A Research-Oriented Top Sites Ranking Hardened Against ManipulationVictor Le Pochat, Tom van Goethem, Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Maciej Korczynski et al.NDSS 2019 · 826 citations
- Acing the IOC Game: Toward Automatic Discovery and Analysis of Open-Source Cyber Threat IntelligenceXiaojing Liao, Kan Yuan, XiaoFeng Wang, Zhou Li et al.CCS 2016 · 308 citations
- Measurement and Analysis of Hajime, a Peer-to-peer IoT BotnetStephen Herwig, Katura Harvey, George Hughey, Richard Roberts et al.NDSS 2019 · 168 citations
- How You Get Shot in the Back: A Systematical Study about Cryptojacking in the Real WorldGeng Hong, Zhemin Yang, Sen Yang, Lei Zhang et al.CCS 2018 · 120 citations
Related papers
- Resident Evil: Understanding Residential IP Proxy as a Dark ServiceXianghang Mi, Xuan Feng, Xiaojing Liao, Baojun Liu et al.S&P 2019 · 80 citations
- Your Phone is My Proxy: Detecting and Understanding Mobile Proxy NetworksXianghang Mi, Siyuan Tang, Zhengyi Li, Xiaojing Liao et al.NDSS 2021
- A nationwide census on wifi security threats: prevalence, riskiness, and the economicsDi Gao, Hao Lin, Zhenhua Li, Feng Qian et al.MobiCom 2021 · 14 citations
- Domains Do Change Their Spots: Quantifying Potential Abuse of Residual TrustJohnny So, Najmeh Miramirkhani, Michael Ferdman, Nick NikiforakisS&P 2022 · 15 citations
- A Lustrum of Malware Network Communication: Evolution and InsightsChaz Lever, Platon Kotzias, Davide Balzarotti, Juan Caballero et al.S&P 2017 · 86 citations
