Making the Classification Explanation Faithful to the Confidence Score
Jian-Xun Mi, Lu Pan, Weisheng Li
Abstract
Deep Neural Networks have revolutionized numerous industries, yet their decision-making processes remain largely opaque. Most existing explanation methods visualize the importance of image regions that influence a classifier's decisions, but they predominantly focus on identifying regions with positive contributions, often overlooking those with negative impacts. In this paper, we introduce a novel black-box explanation method, the Metropolis-Hastings Explainer (MHE), designed to provide confidence-faithful explanations. MHE enhances the fidelity of explanations by ensuring that the explained regions closely align with the original confidence score, sampling instances that best match the classifier's confidence. Furthermore, MHE improves sampling efficiency by utilizing existing valid samples to explore more potential valid ones, reducing computational overhead. To enhance the clarity of explanations, MHE prioritizes valid samples with smaller areas when other factors are equal, thereby reducing the explanation area. Building upon the MHE framework, we propose two extensions: MHE-e, which focuses exclusively on regions with positive contributions, and MHE-pro, which refines explanation quality by integrating multi-scale information. MHE-pro progressively regions, optimizing both sampling efficiency and explanation quality. Experimental results demonstrate that MHE delivers superior and stable explanation quality across various models, including ResNet50, VGG16, ViT, DINO, and CLIP, on datasets such as ImageNet, CUB-200-2011, and VOC2012, providing explanations that closely approximate the original classification confidence. The source code and demo are available at https://github.com/helloAI007/MHE.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e1faae65-b42a-4d39-bdad-e25b77ddb6caBuilds on10
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
- Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth MasksRuth Fong, Mandela Patrick, Andrea VedaldiICCV 2019 · 480 citations
- When Explanations Lie: Why Many Modified BP Attributions FailLeon Sixt, Maximilian Granz, Tim LandgrafICML 2020 · 147 citations
Related papers
- What You See is What You Classify: Black Box AttributionsSteven Stalder, Nathanaël Perraudin, Radhakrishna Achanta, Fernando Pérez-Cruz et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 15 citations
- MaskDiME: Adaptive Masked Diffusion for Precise and Efficient Visual Counterfactual ExplanationsChanglu Guo, Anders Nymark Christensen, Anders Bjorholm Dahl, Morten Rieger HannemoseCVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- Salvage: Shapley-distribution Approximation Learning Via Attribution Guided Exploration for Explainable Image ClassificationMehdi Naouar, Hanne Raum, Jens Rahnfeld, Yannick Vogt et al.ICLR 2025
- Looking in the Mirror: A Faithful Counterfactual Explanation Method for Interpreting Deep Image Classification ModelsTownim Faisal Chowdhury, Vu Minh Hieu Phan, Kewen Liao, Nanyu Dong et al.ICCV 2025
- Explainable Models with Consistent InterpretationsVipin Pillai, Hamed PirsiavashAAAI 2021 · 46 citations
