No Cost Likelihood Manipulation at Test Time for Making Better Mistakes in Deep Networks
Shyamgopal Karthik, Ameya Prabhu, Puneet K. Dokania, Vineet Gandhi
Abstract
There has been increasing interest in building deep hierarchy-aware classifiers that aim to quantify and reduce the severity of mistakes, and not just reduce the number of errors. The idea is to exploit the label hierarchy (e.g., the WordNet ontology) and consider graph distances as a proxy for mistake severity. Surprisingly, on examining mistake-severity distributions of the top-1 prediction, we find that current state-of-the-art hierarchy-aware deep classifiers do not always show practical improvement over the standard cross-entropy baseline in making better mistakes. The reason for the reduction in average mistake-severity can be attributed to the increase in low-severity mistakes, which may also explain the noticeable drop in their accuracy. To this end, we use the classical Conditional Risk Minimization (CRM) framework for hierarchy-aware classification. Given a cost matrix and a reliable estimate of likelihoods (obtained from a trained network), CRM simply amends mistakes at inference time; it needs no extra hyperparameters and requires adding just a few lines of code to the standard cross-entropy baseline. It significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art and consistently obtains large reductions in the average hierarchical distance of top- predictions across datasets, with very little loss in accuracy. CRM, because of its simplicity, can be used with any off-the-shelf trained model that provides reliable likelihood estimates.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e1d643be-72fc-4811-bd16-420fb73b9da7Cited by top-tier papers13
- Hierarchical classification at multiple operating pointsJack ValmadreNeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
- Hierarchical Selective ClassificationShani Goren, Ido Galil, Ran El-YanivNeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations
- Inducing Neural Collapse to a Fixed Hierarchy-Aware Frame for Reducing Mistake SeverityTong Liang, Jim DavisICCV 2023 · 14 citations
- Online Continual Learning on Hierarchical Label ExpansionByung Hyun Lee, Okchul Jung, Jonghyun Choi, Se Young ChunICCV 2023 · 12 citations
- To Err Like Human: Affective Bias-Inspired Measures for Visual Emotion Recognition EvaluationChenxi Zhao, Jinglei Shi, Liqiang Nie, Jufeng YangNeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
Builds on2
- Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal LossJishnu Mukhoti, Viveka Kulharia, Amartya Sanyal, Stuart Golodetz et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 674 citations
- Making Better Mistakes: Leveraging Class Hierarchies With Deep NetworksLuca Bertinetto, Romain Müller, Konstantinos Tertikas, Sina Samangooei et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- Confidence-Aware Learning for Deep Neural NetworksJooyoung Moon, Jihyo Kim, Younghak Shin, Sangheum HwangICML 2020 · 184 citations
- Test-Time Amendment with a Coarse Classifier for Fine-Grained ClassificationKanishk Jain, Shyamgopal Karthik, Vineet GandhiNeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- Detecting Misclassification Errors in Neural Networks with a Gaussian Process ModelXin Qiu, Risto MiikkulainenAAAI 2022 · 13 citations
- Measuring and Reducing Model Update Regression in Structured Prediction for NLPDeng Cai, Elman Mansimov, Yi-An Lai, Yixuan Su et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 14 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation of Transformer Predictions for Misclassification DetectionArtem Vazhentsev, Gleb Kuzmin, Artem Shelmanov, Akim Tsvigun et al.ACL 2022 · 59 citations
