IEBGL: An Interpretability-Enhanced Brain Graph Learning Framework with LLM-Instructed Topology and Literature-Augmented Semantics
Yihang Duan, Shuo Huang, Li Zhang, Meiling Wang, Li Zhang
Abstract
Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) provides rich information for modeling brain connectivity in disease diagnosis. However, most existing brain graph learning methods rely solely on imaging data, leading to limited biological interpretability and poor integration of external medical knowledge. To address these challenges, we propose an Interpretability-Enhanced Brain Graph Learning (IEBGL) framework that anchors brain network modeling in largescale medical knowledge. Our framework introduces two complementary modules: LLM-Instructed Topological Reconstruction (LITR) and Literature-Augmented Semantic Aggregation (LASA). LITR employs large language model (LLM) reasoning to refine brain connectivity and construct topological structure. LASA augments node representations by aggregating semantic information from biomedical literature, ensuring the model's interpretability and relevance to clinical disease knowledge. Finally, the framework is trained with the Graph Bi-directional Mamba Network (GBMN) for disease diagnosis. Extensive experiments on the REST-meta-MDD and ABIDE datasets, together with 35,133 depression-related and 32,617 autism-related publications, demonstrate that IEBGL outperforms state-of-theart methods in classification performance. Further analyses show that the LITR module reveals biologically meaningful alterations in brain connectivity, while the LASA module establishes interpretable associations between these regions and disease-related biomedical literature. Together, these mechanisms help IEBGL explain abnormal brain connections and their links to disease-related knowledge. The code is available at https://github.com/CxImgLab/IEBGL.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on5
- Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation?Chengxuan Ying, Tianle Cai, Shengjie Luo, Shuxin Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,632 citations
- Brain Network TransformerXuan Kan, Wei Dai, Hejie Cui, Zilong Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 272 citations
- Learning Dynamic Graph Representation of Brain Connectome with Spatio-Temporal AttentionByung-Hoon Kim, Jong Chul Ye, Jae-Jin KimNeurIPS 2021 · 224 citations
- Learning to Approximate Adaptive Kernel Convolution on GraphsJaeyoon Sim, Sooyeon Jeon, Injun Choi, Guorong Wu et al.AAAI 2024 · 7 citations
- A Brain Graph Foundation Model: Pre-Training and Prompt-Tuning across Broad Atlases and DisordersXinxu Wei, kanhao zhao, Yong Jiao, Lifang He et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
Related papers
- Make Model Transparent: Brain Network Analysis via Causal and Knowledge Graph LearningLingyuan Meng, Ke Liang, Hao Yu, Haotian Wang et al.AAAI 2026
- Continual Learning for fMRI-Based Brain Disorder Diagnosis via Functional Connectivity Matrices Generative ReplayQianyu Chen, Shujian YuCVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- HyperDiag: Temporal-Regional Hypergraph Learning via Topology-Enhanced State Propagation for Brain Disease DiagnosisYulan Ma, Fangkun Li, Wenchao Yang, Qian Si et al.AAAI 2026
- Long-range Brain Graph TransformerShuo Yu, Shan Jin, Ming Li, Tabinda Sarwar et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 32 citations
- Mario: Multimodal Graph Reasoning with Large Language ModelsYuanfu Sun, Kang Li, Pengkang Guo, Jiajin Liu et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
