Traceable Secret Sharing: Strong Security and Efficient Constructions
Dan Boneh, Aditi Partap, Lior Rotem
Abstract
Suppose Alice uses a -out-of- secret sharing to store her secret key on servers. Her secret key is protected as long as of them do not collude. However, what if a less-than- subset of the servers decides to offer the shares they have for sale? In this case, Alice should be able to hold them accountable, or else nothing prevents them from selling her shares. With this motivation in mind, Goyal, Song, and Srinivasan (CRYPTO 21) introduced the concept of traceable secret sharing. In such schemes, it is possible to provably trace the leaked secret shares back to the servers who leaked them. Goyal et al. presented the first construction of a traceable secret sharing scheme. However, secret shares in their construction are quadratic in the secret size, and their tracing algorithm is quite involved as it relies on Goldreich-Levin decoding.
In this work, we put forth new definitions and practical constructions for traceable secret sharing. In our model, some servers output a reconstruction box that may arbitrarily depend on their shares. Given additional shares, reconstructs and outputs the secret. The task is to trace back to the corrupted servers given black-box access to . Unlike Goyal et al., we do not assume that the tracing algorithm has any information on how the corrupted servers constructed from the shares in their possession.
We then present two very efficient constructions of traceable secret sharing based on two classic secret sharing schemes. In both of our schemes, shares are only twice as large as the secret, improving over the quadratic overhead of Goyal et al. Our first scheme is obtained by presenting a new practical tracing algorithm for the widely-used Shamir secret sharing scheme. Our second construction is based on an extension of Blakley's secret sharing scheme. Tracing in this scheme is optimally efficient, and requires just one successful query to . We believe that our constructions are an important step towards bringing traceable secret-sharing schemes to practice. This work also raises several interesting open problems that we describe in the paper.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get e1a4848e-3042-4e6c-9a62-153e82cc1fd0Cited by top-tier papers3
- Disincentivize Collusion in Verifiable Secret SharingTiantian Gong, Aniket Kate, Hemanta K. Maji, Hai H. NguyenEUROCRYPT 2025 · 3 citations
- CCA-Secure Traceable Threshold (ID-based) Encryption and ApplicationRishiraj Bhattacharyya, Jan Bormet, Sebastian Faust, Pratyay Mukherjee et al.CCS 2025 · 2 citations
- Breaking Omertà: On Threshold Cryptography, Smart Collusion, and WhistleblowingMahimna Kelkar, Aadityan Ganesh, Aditi Partap, Joseph Bonneau et al.CCS 2025 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Traceable Secret Sharing RevisitedVipul Goyal, Abhishek Jain, Aditi PartapEUROCRYPT 2026
- Traceable Secret Sharing Schemes for General Access StructuresOriol Farràs, Miquel GuiotEUROCRYPT 2026
- Traceable Secret Sharing and ApplicationsVipul Goyal, Yifan Song, Akshayaram SrinivasanCRYPTO 2021 · 29 citations
- Traceable Verifiable Random FunctionsDan Boneh, Aditi Partap, Lior RotemCRYPTO 2025 · 7 citations
- Quadratic Secret Sharing and Conditional Disclosure of SecretsAmos Beimel, Hussien Othman, Naty PeterCRYPTO 2021 · 6 citations
