Understanding the Situated Practices of School Technology Leaders in the Early Stages of Educational Technology Adoption
Seray B. Ibrahim, Asimina Vasalou, Laura Benton
Abstract
School-driven technological innovation has the potential to positively impact on classroom practice, yet it can also be disrupted by incompatibilities between the existing school ecology and new educational technologies. To help mitigate this disruption a particular staff member often takes on a facilitative leadership role to champion new technology initiatives. However little is known about how this technology leader role impacts on the adoption of new technologies in the classroom. Taking a situated lens, we embarked on a multiple case study of four schools who were aiming to adopt a new literacy game in the classroom. Through interviews with technology leaders and fieldnotes from our site observations, we systematically analysed their actions and concerns over two academic terms. This highlighted an overwhelming concern with managing the material dimension of the technology, teacher agency and division of labour and mechanisms for communication and monitoring. Our findings raise important considerations for HCI researchers seeking to embed their technologies into practice alongside recommendations for supporting leaders tasked with coordinating this process.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e1108789-7acf-4740-b8f4-5a5c044023c1Cited by top-tier papers3
- "Don't Forget the Teachers": Towards an Educator-Centered Understanding of Harms from Large Language Models in EducationEmma Harvey, Allison Koenecke, René F. KizilcecCHI 2025 · 63 citations
- Who is Helping Whom? Student Concerns about AI-Teacher Collaboration in Higher Education ClassroomsBingyi Han, Simon Coghlan, George Buchanan, Dana McKayCSCW 2025 · 25 citations
- Amplifying Rural Educators' Perspectives: A Qualitative Study on the Impacts of Generative AI in Rural U.S. High SchoolsShira Michel, Benjamin Taylor, Sabrina Parra Díaz, Joseph B. Wiggins et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Participatory Design Goes to School: Co-Teaching as a Form of Co-Design for Educational TechnologyRebecca Nicholson, Tom Bartindale, Ahmed Kharrufa, David Kirk et al.CHI 2022 · 42 citations
- Toward Supporting Adaptation: Exploring Affect's Role in Cognitive Load when Using a Literacy GameMinghao Cai, Genaro Rebolledo-Méndez, Gisele Arevalo, Sin Sze Tang et al.CHI 2024 · 5 citations
- From Primary Education to Premium Workforce: Drawing on K-12 Approaches for Developing AI LiteracyMagnus Høholt Kaspersen, Line Have Musaeus, Karl-Emil Kjær Bilstrup, Marianne Graves Petersen et al.CHI 2024 · 23 citations
- Teachers' Perceptions around Digital Games for Children in Low-resource Schools for the BlindGesu India, Vidhya Y, O Aishwarya, Nirmalendu Diwakar et al.CHI 2021 · 16 citations
- Designing Narrative-Focused Role-Playing Games for Visualization Literacy in Young ChildrenElaine Huynh, Angela Nyhout, Patricia Ganea, Fanny ChevalierIEEE VIS 2020 · 58 citations
