Learning Opinion Summarizers by Selecting Informative Reviews
Arthur Brazinskas, Mirella Lapata, Ivan Titov
Abstract
Opinion summarization has been traditionally approached with unsupervised, weaklysupervised and few-shot learning techniques. In this work, we collect a large dataset of summaries paired with user reviews for over 31,000 products, enabling supervised training. However, the number of reviews per product is large (320 on average), making summarization -and especially training a summarizerimpractical. Moreover, the content of many reviews is not reflected in the human-written summaries, and, thus, the summarizer trained on random review subsets hallucinates. In order to deal with both of these challenges, we formulate the task as jointly learning to select informative subsets of reviews and summarizing the opinions expressed in these subsets. The choice of the review subset is treated as a latent variable, predicted by a small and simple selector. The subset is then fed into a more powerful summarizer. For joint training, we use amortized variational inference and policy gradient methods. Our experiments demonstrate the importance of selecting informative reviews resulting in improved quality of summaries and reduced hallucinations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e08feffc-11f1-4506-8c69-b75721daed84Cited by top-tier papers5
- Factual and Informative Review Generation for Explainable RecommendationZhouhang Xie, Sameer Singh, Julian J. McAuley, Bodhisattwa Prasad MajumderAAAI 2023 · 36 citations
- Shilling Black-box Review-based Recommender Systems through Fake Review GenerationHung-Yun Chiang, Yi-Syuan Chen, Yun-Zhu Song, Hong-Han Shuai et al.KDD 2023 · 15 citations
- Attributable and Scalable Opinion SummarizationTom Hosking, Hao Tang, Mirella LapataACL 2023 · 5 citations
- Less Is More? Examining Fairness in Pruned Large Language Models for Summarising OpinionsNannan Huang, Haytham M. Fayek, Xiuzhen ZhangEMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- How to Compare Things Properly? A Study of Argument Relevance in Comparative Question AnsweringIrina Nikishina, Saba Anwar, Nikolay Dolgov, Maria Manina et al.ACL 2025
Builds on9
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- Dice Loss for Data-imbalanced NLP TasksXiaoya Li, Xiaofei Sun, Yuxian Meng, Junjun Liang et al.ACL 2020 · 575 citations
- Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of SummariesAlex Wang, Kyunghyun Cho, Mike LewisACL 2020 · 317 citations
- Pre-training via ParaphrasingMike Lewis, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Gargi Ghosh, Armen Aghajanyan et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 165 citations
- On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive SummarizationJoshua Maynez, Shashi Narayan, Bernd Bohnet, Ryan T. McDonaldACL 2020 · 54 citations
Related papers
- Unsupervised Opinion Summarization as Copycat-Review GenerationArthur Brazinskas, Mirella Lapata, Ivan TitovACL 2020 · 14 citations
- Few-Shot Learning for Opinion SummarizationArthur Brazinskas, Mirella Lapata, Ivan TitovEMNLP 2020 · 4 citations
- Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Noising and DenoisingReinald Kim Amplayo, Mirella LapataACL 2020 · 8 citations
- Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Content PlanningReinald Kim Amplayo, Stefanos Angelidis, Mirella LapataAAAI 2021 · 51 citations
- Unsupervised Extractive Opinion Summarization Using Sparse CodingSomnath Basu Roy Chowdhury, Chao Zhao, Snigdha ChaturvediACL 2022
