Conversations About Crime: Re-Enforcing and Fighting Against Platformed Racism on Reddit
Qunfang Wu, Louisa Kayah Williams, Ellen Simpson, Bryan C. Semaan
Abstract
With the emergence of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), people are being exposed to an increased volume of crime-related information, which induces fear. While the fear of crime has been explored around people's experiences with crime, little is known about how people frame their conversations about crime online. In this study, we explore how citizens talk about crime on Reddit. By collecting crime conversations from the subreddit r/baltimore, we find that, on the surface, redditors discuss topics such as comparing crime rates in Baltimore with other cities in an effort to destigmatize the depictions of Baltimore as a city rife with crime. On a deeper level, we find that through their conversations about crime, redditors are engaging in discourse frames that both re-enforce and fight against platformed racism. On the one hand, some redditors perpetuate racially coded language that is rife with anti-Black stereotypes, framing their conversations using old and new racism to cover their racism and discrimination against Black people. On the other hand, others push back against platformed racism by drawing attention to individual racism and systemic racism, and situating crime in root, societal causes. We then discuss how platformed racism operates in online conversations, and develop the concepts of weaponized identity and digital gentrification, which we argue are ways in which people, through their engagements in digital platforms, continue to perpetuate white hegemonic power structures in society. Finally, we discuss implications for how to design to support the fight against platformed racism in sociotechnical systems like Reddit. As a content note and warning, this paper discusses racist content which may be upsetting or harmful to some readers.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Towards Intersectional Moderation: An Alternative Model of Moderation Built on Care and PowerSarah A. GilbertCSCW 2023 · 26 citations
- Under the (neighbor)hood: Hyperlocal Surveillance on NextdoorMadiha Zahrah Choksi, Marianne Aubin Le Quéré, Travis Lloyd, Ruojia Tao et al.CHI 2024 · 14 citations
- Governance of the Black Experience on Reddit: r/BlackPeopleTwitter as a Case Study in Supporting Sense of Virtual Community for Black UsersC. Estelle Smith, Shamika Klassen, Gale H. Prinster, Chenhao Tan et al.CSCW 2024 · 13 citations
- Dismantling Gender Blindness in Online Discussion of a Crime/Gender DichotomyYigang Qin, Weilun Duan, Qunfang Wu, Zhicong LuCSCW 2024 · 11 citations
- Linguistically Differentiating Acts and Recalls of Racial Microaggressions on Social MediaUma Sushmitha Gunturi, Anisha Kumar, Xiaohan Ding, Eugenia Ha Rim RhoCSCW 2024 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Negotiating Sociotechnical Boundaries: Moderation Work to Counter Racist Attacks in Online CommunitiesQunfang Wu, Tayara Romero, Bryan C. SemaanCHI 2024 · 7 citations
- "How Do You Quantify How Racist Something Is?": Color-Blind Moderation in Decentralized GovernanceQunfang Wu, Bryan C. SemaanCSCW 2023 · 11 citations
- Reducing Uncertainty and Offering Comfort: Designing Technology for Coping with Interpersonal RacismAlexandra To, Hillary Carey, Geoff Kaufman, Jessica HammerCHI 2021 · 38 citations
- Interactive Fiction Provotypes for Coping with Interpersonal RacismAlexandra To, Hillary Carey, Riya Shrivastava, Jessica Hammer et al.CHI 2022 · 18 citations
- Platformization of Inequality: Gender and Race in Digital Labor PlatformsIsabel Muñoz, Pyeonghwa Kim, Clea O'Neil, Michael Dunn et al.CSCW 2024 · 29 citations
