Faithful Model Explanations through Energy-Constrained Conformal Counterfactuals
Patrick Altmeyer, Mojtaba Farmanbar, Arie van Deursen, Cynthia C. S. Liem
Abstract
Counterfactual explanations offer an intuitive and straightforward way to explain black-box models and offer algorithmic recourse to individuals. To address the need for plausible explanations, existing work has primarily relied on surrogate models to learn how the input data is distributed. This effectively reallocates the task of learning realistic explanations for the data from the model itself to the surrogate. Consequently, the generated explanations may seem plausible to humans but need not necessarily describe the behaviour of the black-box model faithfully. We formalise this notion of faithfulness through the introduction of a tailored evaluation metric and propose a novel algorithmic framework for generating Energy-Constrained Conformal Counterfactuals that are only as plausible as the model permits. Through extensive empirical studies, we demonstrate that ECCCo reconciles the need for faithfulness and plausibility. In particular, we show that for models with gradient access, it is possible to achieve state-of-the-art performance without the need for surrogate models. To do so, our framework relies solely on properties defining the black-box model itself by leveraging recent advances in energy-based modelling and conformal prediction. To our knowledge, this is the first venture in this direction for generating faithful counterfactual explanations. Thus, we anticipate that ECCCo can serve as a baseline for future research. We believe that our work opens avenues for researchers and practitioners seeking tools to better distinguish trustworthy from unreliable models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e075fc63-8ae2-4b66-90de-99402f9b9957Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- Your classifier is secretly an energy based model and you should treat it like oneWill Grathwohl, Kuan-Chieh Wang, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, David Duvenaud et al.ICLR 2020 · 643 citations
- Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic RecourseSohini Upadhyay, Shalmali Joshi, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 145 citations
- Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic RecourseMartin Pawelczyk, Teresa Datta, Johannes van den Heuvel, Gjergji Kasneci et al.ICLR 2023 · 13 citations
Related papers
- Learning Global Transparent Models consistent with Local Contrastive ExplanationsTejaswini Pedapati, Avinash Balakrishnan, Karthikeyan Shanmugam, Amit DhurandharNeurIPS 2020 · 35 citations
- On Generating Plausible Counterfactual and Semi-Factual Explanations for Deep LearningEoin M. Kenny, Mark T. KeaneAAAI 2021 · 122 citations
- Explaining Black-Box Algorithms Using Probabilistic Contrastive CounterfactualsSainyam Galhotra, Romila Pradhan, Babak SalimiSIGMOD 2021 · 85 citations
- Derivative-Free Diffusion Manifold-Constrained Gradient for Unified XAIWon Jun Kim, Hyungjin Chung, Jaemin Kim, Sangmin Lee et al.CVPR 2025
- Learning Feasible Causal Algorithmic Recourse: A Prior Structural Knowledge Free ApproachHaotian Wang, Hao Zou, Xueguang Zhou, Shangwen Wang et al.WWW 2025 · 1 citation
