Learning Synthetic Environments and Reward Networks for Reinforcement Learning
Fabio Ferreira, Thomas Nierhoff, Andreas Sälinger, Frank Hutter
Abstract
We introduce Synthetic Environments (SEs) and Reward Networks (RNs), represented by neural networks, as proxy environment models for training Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents. We show that an agent, after being trained exclusively on the SE, is able to solve the corresponding real environment. While an SE acts as a full proxy to a real environment by learning about its state dynamics and rewards, an RN is a partial proxy that learns to augment or replace rewards. We use bi-level optimization to evolve SEs and RNs: the inner loop trains the RL agent, and the outer loop trains the parameters of the SE / RN via an evolution strategy. We evaluate our proposed new concept on a broad range of RL algorithms and classic control environments. In a one-to-one comparison, learning an SE proxy requires more interactions with the real environment than training agents only on the real environment. However, once such an SE has been learned, we do not need any interactions with the real environment to train new agents. Moreover, the learned SE proxies allow us to train agents with fewer interactions while maintaining the original task performance. Our empirical results suggest that SEs achieve this result by learning informed representations that bias the agents towards relevant states. Moreover, we find that these proxies are robust against hyperparameter variation and can also transfer to unseen agents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dff1c96f-0f90-4ddf-90cf-95c2a05bcfecCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement LearningKarl Cobbe, Christopher Hesse, Jacob Hilton, John SchulmanICML 2020 · 685 citations
- Emergent Complexity and Zero-shot Transfer via Unsupervised Environment DesignMichael Dennis, Natasha Jaques, Eugene Vinitsky, Alexandre M. Bayen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 362 citations
- Learning to Utilize Shaping Rewards: A New Approach of Reward ShapingYujing Hu, Weixun Wang, Hangtian Jia, Yixiang Wang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 256 citations
- Generative Teaching Networks: Accelerating Neural Architecture Search by Learning to Generate Synthetic Training DataFelipe Petroski Such, Aditya Rawal, Joel Lehman, Kenneth O. Stanley et al.ICML 2020 · 180 citations
- What Can Learned Intrinsic Rewards Capture?Zeyu Zheng, Junhyuk Oh, Matteo Hessel, Zhongwen Xu et al.ICML 2020 · 87 citations
Related papers
- Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning for Sample-Efficient Multiagent CoordinationSomdeb Majumdar, Shauharda Khadka, Santiago Miret, Stephen McAleer et al.ICML 2020 · 70 citations
- Deep Innovation Protection: Confronting the Credit Assignment Problem in Training Heterogeneous Neural ArchitecturesSebastian Risi, Kenneth O. StanleyAAAI 2021
- Learning Human Objectives by Evaluating Hypothetical BehaviorSiddharth Reddy, Anca D. Dragan, Sergey Levine, Shane Legg et al.ICML 2020 · 81 citations
- Safe and Scalable Web Agent Learning via Recreated WebsitesHyungjoo Chae, Jungsoo Park, Alan RitterICML 2026
- Improving Generalization in Meta Reinforcement Learning using Learned ObjectivesLouis Kirsch, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Jürgen SchmidhuberICLR 2020 · 132 citations
