Learning Diverse Risk Preferences in Population-Based Self-Play
Yuhua Jiang, Qihan Liu, Xiaoteng Ma, Chenghao Li, Yiqin Yang, Jun Yang, Bin Liang, Qianchuan Zhao
Abstract
Among the remarkable successes of Reinforcement Learning (RL), self-play algorithms have played a crucial role in solving competitive games. However, current self-play RL methods commonly optimize the agent to maximize the expected win-rates against its current or historical copies, resulting in a limited strategy style and a tendency to get stuck in local optima. To address this limitation, it is important to improve the diversity of policies, allowing the agent to break stalemates and enhance its robustness when facing with different opponents. In this paper, we present a novel perspective to promote diversity by considering that agents could have diverse risk preferences in the face of uncertainty. To achieve this, we introduce a novel reinforcement learning algorithm called Risk-sensitive Proximal Policy Optimization (RPPO), which smoothly interpolates between worst-case and best-case policy learning, enabling policy learning with desired risk preferences. Furthermore, by seamlessly integrating RPPO with population-based self-play, agents in the population optimize dynamic risk-sensitive objectives using experiences gained from playing against diverse opponents. Our empirical results demonstrate that our method achieves comparable or superior performance in competitive games and, importantly, leads to the emergence of diverse behavioral modes. Code is available at https://github.com/Jackory/RPBT .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dfd5a81e-0777-4f8f-819e-5da83f38c643Cited by top-tier papers3
- Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning for Alleviating Exploration Dilemmas in Large Language ModelsYuhua Jiang, Jiawei Huang, Yufeng Yuan, Xin Mao et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Craftium: Bridging Flexibility and Efficiency for Rich 3D Single- and Multi-Agent EnvironmentsMikel Malagón, Josu Ceberio, José Antonio LozanoICML 2025
- Episodic Novelty Through Temporal DistanceYuhua Jiang, Qihan Liu, Yiqin Yang, Xiaoteng Ma et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on15
- Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent AutocurriculaBowen Baker, Ingmar Kanitscheider, Todor M. Markov, Yi Wu et al.ICLR 2020 · 751 citations
- Collaborating with Humans without Human DataDJ Strouse, Kevin R. McKee, Matt M. Botvinick, Edward Hughes et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 239 citations
- Effective Diversity in Population Based Reinforcement LearningJack Parker-Holder, Aldo Pacchiano, Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski, Stephen J. RobertsNeurIPS 2020 · 195 citations
- WCSAC: Worst-Case Soft Actor Critic for Safety-Constrained Reinforcement LearningQisong Yang, Thiago D. Simão, Simon H. Tindemans, Matthijs T. J. SpaanAAAI 2021 · 168 citations
- Trajectory Diversity for Zero-Shot CoordinationAndrei Lupu, Brandon Cui, Hengyuan Hu, Jakob N. FoersterICML 2021 · 157 citations
Related papers
- Proximal Policy Gradient Arborescence for Quality Diversity Reinforcement LearningSumeet Batra, Bryon Tjanaka, Matthew Christopher Fontaine, Aleksei Petrenko et al.ICLR 2024 · 26 citations
- Coordinated Proximal Policy OptimizationZifan Wu, Chao Yu, Deheng Ye, Junge Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 73 citations
- Adversarial Policy Training against Deep Reinforcement LearningXian Wu, Wenbo Guo, Hua Wei, Xinyu XingUSENIX Security 2021 · 19 citations
- Polychromic Objectives for Reinforcement LearningJubayer Ibn Hamid, Ifdita Hasan Orney, Ellen Xu, Chelsea Finn et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement LearningPenghui Qi, Xiangxin Zhou, Zichen Liu, Tianyu Pang et al.ICML 2026 · 22 citations
