Gleipnir: toward practical error analysis for Quantum programs
Runzhou Tao, Yunong Shi, Jianan Yao, John Hui, Frederic T. Chong, Ronghui Gu
Abstract
Practical error analysis is essential for the design, optimization, and evaluation of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computing. However, bounding errors in quantum programs is a grand challenge, because the effects of quantum errors depend on exponentially large quantum states. In this work, we present Gleipnir, a novel methodology toward practically computing verified error bounds in quantum programs. Gleipnir introduces the ( ρ, 𝛿)-diamond norm, an error metric constrained by a quantum predicate consisting of the approximate state ρ and its distance 𝛿 to the ideal state 𝜌. This predicate ( ρ, 𝛿) can be computed adaptively using tensor networks based on Matrix Product States. Gleipnir features a lightweight logic for reasoning about error bounds in noisy quantum programs, based on the ( ρ, 𝛿)-diamond norm metric. Our experimental results show that Gleipnir is able to efficiently generate tight error bounds for real-world quantum programs with 10 to 100 qubits, and can be used to evaluate the error mitigation performance of quantum compiler transformations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext df9df596-5ff6-4ee1-b2d5-9f8762f0b830Cited by top-tier papers16
- Bugs in Quantum computing platforms: an empirical studyMatteo Paltenghi, Michael PradelOOPSLA 2022 · 70 citations
- Giallar: push-button verification for the qiskit Quantum compilerRunzhou Tao, Yunong Shi, Jianan Yao, Xupeng Li et al.PLDI 2022 · 44 citations
- Twist: sound reasoning for purity and entanglement in Quantum programsCharles Yuan, Christopher McNally, Michael CarbinPOPL 2022 · 30 citations
- On incorrectness logic for Quantum programsPeng Yan, Hanru Jiang, Nengkun YuOOPSLA 2022 · 27 citations
- Verifying Fault-Tolerance of Quantum Error Correction CodesKean Chen, Yuhao Liu, Wang Fang, Jennifer Paykin et al.CAV 2025 · 6 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Experimental evaluation of NISQ quantum computers: error measurement, characterization, and implicationsTirthak Patel, Abhay Potharaju, Baolin Li, Rohan Basu Roy et al.SC 2020 · 37 citations
- Quixote: Improving Fidelity of Quantum Program by Independent Execution of Controlled GatesEnhyeok Jang, Seungwoo Choi, Won Woo RoDAC 2023 · 3 citations
- Approximate Equivalence Checking of Noisy Quantum CircuitsXin Hong, Mingsheng Ying, Yuan Feng, Xiangzhen Zhou et al.DAC 2021 · 27 citations
- Adaptive Fidelity Estimation for Quantum Programs with Graph-Guided Noise AwarenessTingting Li, Ziming Zhao, Jianwei YinAAAI 2026
- Analyzing Quantum Programs with LintQ: A Static Analysis Framework for QiskitMatteo Paltenghi, Michael PradelFSE 2024 · 19 citations
