Decoupling Positional and Symbolic Attention in Transformers
Felipe Urrutia, Jorge Salas, Alexander Kozachinskiy, Cristian Buc Calderon, Hector Pasten, Cristobal Rojas
Abstract
An important aspect subtending language understanding and production is the ability to independently encode positional and symbolic information of the words within a sentence. In Transformers, positional information is typically encoded using Positional Encodings (PEs). One such popular PE, namely Rotary PE (RoPE), has been widely used due to its empirical success.
Recently, it has been argued that part of RoPE's success emerges from its ability to encode robust positional and semantic information using large and small frequencies, respectively. In this work, we perform a deeper dive into the positional versus symbolic dichotomy of attention heads behavior, both at the theoretical and empirical level. We provide general definitions of what it means for a head to behave positionally or symbolically, prove that these are two mutually exclusive behaviors and develop a metric to quantify them.
We apply our framework to analyze Transformer-based LLMs using RoPE and find that all heads exhibit a strong correspondence between behavior and frequency use.
Finally, we introduce canonical tasks designed to be either purely positional or symbolic, and demonstrate that the Transformer performance causally relates to the ability of attention heads to leverage the appropriate frequencies. In particular, we show that we can control the Transformer performance by controlling which frequencies the attention heads can access. Altogether, our work provides a detailed understanding of RoPE, and how its properties relate to model behavior.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext df9d688c-73c0-40dd-a5f5-3f5aaba96b9fBuilds on19
- YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language ModelsBowen Peng, Jeffrey Quesnelle, Honglu Fan, Enrico ShippoleICLR 2024 · 508 citations
- The Impact of Positional Encoding on Length Generalization in TransformersAmirhossein Kazemnejad, Inkit Padhi, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Payel Das et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 444 citations
- LongRoPE: Extending LLM Context Window Beyond 2 Million TokensYiran Ding, Li Lyna Zhang, Chengruidong Zhang, Yuanyuan Xu et al.ICML 2024 · 316 citations
- Representational Strengths and Limitations of TransformersClayton Sanford, Daniel J. Hsu, Matus TelgarskyNeurIPS 2023 · 162 citations
- Scaling Laws of RoPE-based ExtrapolationXiaoran Liu, Hang Yan, Chenxin An, Xipeng Qiu et al.ICLR 2024 · 130 citations
Related papers
- Round and Round We Go! What makes Rotary Positional Encodings useful?Federico Barbero, Alex Vitvitskyi, Christos Perivolaropoulos, Razvan Pascanu et al.ICLR 2025
- AdaRoPE: Not All Attention Heads Should Rotate and Scale EquallyShaowen Wang, Yuke Zheng, Tansheng Zhu, Shuang Chen et al.ICML 2026
- HoPE: A Novel Positional Encoding Without Long-Term Decay for Enhanced Context Awareness and ExtrapolationYuhan Chen, Ang Lv, Jian Luan, Bin Wang et al.ACL 2025
- Deconstructing Positional Information: From Attention Logits to Training BiasesZihan Gu, Ruoyu Chen, Han Zhang, Hua Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Revisiting Multimodal Positional Encoding in Vision–Language ModelsJie Huang, Xuejing Liu, Sibo Song, RuiBing Hou et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
