PopAlign: Diversifying Contrasting Patterns for a More Comprehensive Alignment
Zekun Moore Wang, Shenzhi Wang, King Zhu, Jiaheng Liu, Ke Xu, Jie Fu, Wangchunshu Zhou, Wenhao Huang
Abstract
Alignment of large language models (LLMs) involves training models on preference-contrastive output pairs to adjust their responses according to human preferences. To obtain such contrastive pairs, traditional methods like RLHF and RLAIF rely on limited contrasting patterns, such as varying model variants or decoding temperatures. This singularity leads to two issues: (1) alignment is not comprehensive; and thereby (2) models are susceptible to jailbreaking attacks. To address these issues, we investigate how to construct more comprehensive and diversified contrasting patterns to enhance preference data (RQ1) and verify the impact of the diversification of contrasting patterns on model alignment (RQ2). For RQ1, we propose PopAlign, a framework that integrates diversified contrasting patterns across the prompt, model, and pipeline levels, introducing six contrasting strategies that do not require additional feedback labeling procedures. Regarding RQ2, we conduct thorough experiments demonstrating that PopAlign significantly outperforms existing methods, leading to more comprehensive alignment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Recontextualization Mitigates Specification Gaming Without Modifying the SpecificationAriana Azarbal, Victor Gillioz, Vladimir Ivanov, Bryce Woodworth et al.ICML 2026 · 11 citations
- Inverse Constitutional AI: Compressing Preferences into PrinciplesArduin Findeis, Timo Kaufmann, Eyke Hüllermeier, Samuel Albanie et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
- Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human PreferenceWei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos et al.ICML 2024 · 1,212 citations
Related papers
- Mission Impossible: A Statistical Perspective on Jailbreaking LLMsJingtong Su, Julia Kempe, Karen UllrichNeurIPS 2024 · 38 citations
- DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language ModelsJames Y. Huang, Sailik Sengupta, Daniele Bonadiman, Yi-An Lai et al.ACL 2025
- Alignment-Weighted DPO: A principled reasoning approach to improve safety alignmentMengxuan Hu, Vivek V. Datla, Anoop Kumar, Zihan Guan et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Defending Against Alignment-Breaking Attacks via Robustly Aligned LLMBochuan Cao, Yuanpu Cao, Lu Lin, Jinghui ChenACL 2024 · 34 citations
- Improving LLM Safety Alignment with Dual-Objective OptimizationXuandong Zhao, Will Cai, Tianneng Shi, David Huang et al.ICML 2025
