EarthSE: A Benchmark Evaluating Earth Scientific Exploration Capability for Large Language Models
Wanghan Xu, Xiangyu Zhao, Yuhao Zhou, Xiaoyu Yue, Ben Fei, Fenghua Ling, Wenlong Zhang, LEI BAI
Abstract
Advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) drive interest in scientific applications, necessitating specialized benchmarks such as Earth science. Existing benchmarks either present a general science focus devoid of Earth science specificity or cover isolated subdomains, lacking holistic evaluation. Furthermore, current benchmarks typically neglect the assessment of LLMs' capabilities in open-ended scientific exploration. In this paper, we present a comprehensive and professional benchmark for the Earth sciences, designed to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in scientific exploration within this domain, spanning from fundamental to advanced levels. Leveraging a corpus of 100,000 research papers, we first construct two Question Answering (QA) datasets: Earth-Iron, which offers extensive question coverage for broad assessment, and Earth-Silver, which features a higher level of difficulty to evaluate professional depth. These datasets encompass five Earth spheres, 114 disciplines, and 11 task categories, assessing foundational knowledge crucial for scientific exploration. Most notably, we introduce Earth-Gold with new metrics, a dataset comprising open-ended multi-turn dialogues specifically designed to evaluate the depth and diversity of LLMs in scientific exploration, including methodology induction, limitation analysis, and concept proposal. Extensive experiments reveal limitations in 11 leading LLMs across different domains and tasks, highlighting considerable room for improvement in their scientific exploration capabilities. The data is available on https://huggingface.co/ai-earth.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on6
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question AnsweringPan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,727 citations
- SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language ModelsXiaoxuan Wang, Ziniu Hu, Pan Lu, Yanqiao Zhu et al.ICML 2024 · 220 citations
- OceanGPT: A Large Language Model for Ocean Science TasksZhen Bi, Ningyu Zhang, Yida Xue, Yixin Ou et al.ACL 2024 · 35 citations
Related papers
- MSEarth: A Multimodal Benchmark for Earth Science Phenomenon Discovery with MLLMsXiangyu Zhao, Wanghan Xu, Bo Liu, Yuhao Zhou et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- LLM-SRBench: A New Benchmark for Scientific Equation Discovery with Large Language ModelsParshin Shojaee, Ngoc-Hieu Nguyen, Kazem Meidani, Amir Barati Farimani et al.ICML 2025
- SciEx: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Scientific Exams with Human Expert Grading and Automatic GradingTu Anh Dinh, Carlos Mullov, Leonard Bärmann, Zhaolin Li et al.EMNLP 2024 · 10 citations
- ProfBench: Multi-Domain Rubrics requiring Professional Knowledge to Answer and JudgeZhilin Wang, Jaehun Jung, Ximing Lu, Shizhe Diao et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
- SciEval: A Multi-Level Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark for Scientific ResearchLiangtai Sun, Yang Han, Zihan Zhao, Da Ma et al.AAAI 2024 · 150 citations
