Membership Inference Attacks With False Discovery Rate Control
Chenxu Zhao, Wei Qian, Aobo Chen, Mengdi Huai
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that deep learning models are vulnerable to membership inference attacks (MIAs), which aim to infer whether a data record was used to train a target model or not. To analyze and study these vulnerabilities, various MIA methods have been proposed. Despite the significance and popularity of MIAs, existing works on MIAs are limited in providing guarantees on the false discovery rate (FDR), which refers to the expected proportion of false discoveries among the identified positive discoveries. However, it is very challenging to ensure the false discovery rate guarantees, because the underlying distribution is usually unknown, and the estimated non-member probabilities often exhibit interdependence. To tackle the above challenges, in this paper, we design a novel membership inference attack method, which can provide the guarantees on the false discovery rate. Additionally, we show that our method can also provide the marginal probability guarantee on labeling true non-member data as member data. Notably, our method can work as a wrapper that can be seamlessly integrated with existing MIA methods in a post-hoc manner, while also providing the FDR control. We perform the theoretical analysis for our method. Extensive experiments in various settings (e.g., the black-box setting and the lifelong learning setting) are also conducted to verify the desirable performance of our method.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext de72cea2-805c-42a8-8b73-ff03b46319efBuilds on39
- Segment AnythingAlexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao et al.ICCV 2023 · 13,211 citations
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language ModelsKaiyang Zhou, Jingkang Yang, Chen Change Loy, Ziwei LiuCVPR 2022 · 1,438 citations
- Machine UnlearningLucas Bourtoule, Varun Chandrasekaran, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Hengrui Jia et al.S&P 2021 · 1,381 citations
Related papers
- Membership Inference Attacks by Exploiting Loss TrajectoryYiyong Liu, Zhengyu Zhao, Michael Backes, Yang ZhangCCS 2022 · 79 citations
- On the Difficulty of Membership Inference AttacksShahbaz Rezaei, Xin LiuCVPR 2021
- Defending Privacy Against More Knowledgeable Membership Inference AttackersYu Yin, Ke Chen, Lidan Shou, Gang ChenKDD 2021 · 12 citations
- Mixup Training for Generative Models to Defend Membership Inference AttacksZhe Ji, Qiansiqi Hu, Liyao Xiang, Chenghu ZhouINFOCOM 2023 · 3 citations
- Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial RegularizationMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrCCS 2018 · 543 citations
