Membership Inference Attacks are Easier on Difficult Problems
Avital Shafran, Shmuel Peleg, Yedid Hoshen
Abstract
Membership inference attacks (MIA) try to detect if data samples were used to train a neural network model, e.g. to detect copyright abuses. We show that models with higher dimensional input and output are more vulnerable to MIA, and address in more detail models for image translation and semantic segmentation, including medical image segmentation. We show that reconstruction-errors can lead to very effective MIA attacks as they are indicative of memorization. Unfortunately, reconstruction error alone is less effective at discriminating between non-predictable images used in training and easy to predict images that were never seen before. To overcome this, we propose using a novel predictability error that can be computed for each sample, and its computation does not require a training set. Our membership error, obtained by subtracting the predictability error from the reconstruction error, is shown to achieve high MIA accuracy on an extensive number of benchmarks. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?Pratyush Maini, Hengrui Jia, Nicolas Papernot, Adam DziedzicNeurIPS 2024 · 162 citations
- Verification of Machine Unlearning is FragileBinchi Zhang, Zihan Chen, Cong Shen, Jundong LiICML 2024 · 21 citations
- Recovering the Pre-Fine-Tuning Weights of Generative ModelsEliahu Horwitz, Jonathan Kahana, Yedid HoshenICML 2024 · 13 citations
- Benchmarking Empirical Privacy Protection for Adaptations of Large Language ModelsBartlomiej Marek, Lorenzo Rossi, Vincent Hanke, Xun Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Active Membership Inference Test (aMINT): Enhancing Model Auditability with Multi-Task LearningDaniel DeAlcala, Aythami Morales, Julian Fierrez, Gonzalo Mancera et al.ICCV 2025 · 3 citations
Builds on9
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- NVAE: A Deep Hierarchical Variational AutoencoderArash Vahdat, Jan KautzNeurIPS 2020 · 1,141 citations
- ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning ModelsAhmed Salem, Yang Zhang, Mathias Humbert, Pascal Berrang et al.NDSS 2019 · 1,141 citations
Related papers
- Membership Inference Attacks against Large Vision-Language ModelsZhan Li, Yongtao Wu, Yihang Chen, Francesco Tonin et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 43 citations
- Towards Black-Box Membership Inference Attack for Diffusion ModelsJingwei Li, Jing Dong, Tianxing He, Jingzhao ZhangICML 2025
- Unveiling Structural Memorization: Structural Membership Inference Attack for Text-to-Image Diffusion ModelsQiao Li, Xiaomeng Fu, Xi Wang, Jin Liu et al.ACM MM 2024 · 6 citations
- Privacy Leaks by Adversaries: Adversarial Iterations for Membership Inference AttackJing Xue, Zhishen Sun, Haishan Ye, Luo Luo et al.AAAI 2026
- On the Difficulty of Membership Inference AttacksShahbaz Rezaei, Xin LiuCVPR 2021
