Hiding Critical Program Components via Ambiguous Translation
Chijung Jung, Doowon Kim, An Chen, Weihang Wang, Yunhui Zheng, Kyu Hyung Lee, Yonghwi Kwon
Abstract
Software systems may contain critical program components such as patented program logic or sensitive data. When those components are reverse-engineered by adversaries, it can cause significantly damage (e.g., financial loss or operational failures). While protecting critical program components (e.g., code or data) in software systems is of utmost importance, existing approaches, unfortunately, have two major weaknesses: (1) they can be reverse-engineered via various program analysis techniques and (2) when an adversary obtains a legitimate-looking critical program component, he or she can be sure that it is genuine. In this paper, we propose Ambitr, a novel technique that hides critical program components. The core of Ambitr is Ambiguous Translator that can generate the critical program components when the input is a correct secret key. The translator is ambiguous as it can accept any inputs and produces a number of legitimate-looking outputs, making it difficult to know whether an input is correct secret key or not. The executions of the translator when it processes the correct secret key and other inputs are also indistinguishable, making the analysis inconclusive. Our evaluation results show that static, dynamic and symbolic analysis techniques fail to identify the hidden information in Ambitr. We also demonstrate that manual analysis of Ambitr is extremely challenging. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Software security engineering; Software reverse engineering.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext de39de89-f887-4f8c-83fa-33941ffb2ef5Builds on6
- Cryptographic Function Detection in Obfuscated Binaries via Bit-Precise Symbolic Loop MappingDongpeng Xu, Jiang Ming, Dinghao WuS&P 2017 · 83 citations
- HideNoSeek: Camouflaging Malicious JavaScript in Benign ASTsAurore Fass, Michael Backes, Ben StockCCS 2019 · 78 citations
- Towards Paving the Way for Large-Scale Windows Malware Analysis: Generic Binary Unpacking with Orders-of-Magnitude Performance BoostBinlin Cheng, Jiang Ming, Jianming Fu, Guojun Peng et al.CCS 2018 · 68 citations
- Obfuscation-Resilient Executable Payload Extraction From Packed MalwareBinlin Cheng, Jiang Ming, Erika A. Leal, Haotian Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 29 citations
- MalMax: Multi-Aspect Execution for Automated Dynamic Web Server Malware AnalysisAbbas Naderi-Afooshteh, Yonghwi Kwon, Anh Nguyen-Tuong, Ali Razmjoo-Qalaei et al.CCS 2019 · 18 citations
Related papers
- Protecting Intellectual Property of Large Language Model-Based Code Generation APIs via WatermarksZongjie Li, Chaozheng Wang, Shuai Wang, Cuiyun GaoCCS 2023 · 25 citations
- Loki: Hardening Code Obfuscation Against Automated AttacksMoritz Schloegel, Tim Blazytko, Moritz Contag, Cornelius Aschermann et al.USENIX Security 2022
- MBA-Blast: Unveiling and Simplifying Mixed Boolean-Arithmetic ObfuscationBinbin Liu, Junfu Shen, Jiang Ming, Qilong Zheng et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 37 citations
- SR-SFLL: Structurally Robust Stripped Functionality Logic LockingGourav Takhar, Subhajit RoyCAV 2023 · 8 citations
- DECOY: DEflection-Driven HLS-Based Computation Partitioning for Obfuscating Intellectual PropertYJianqi Chen, Monir Zaman, Yiorgos Makris, R. D. Shawn Blanton et al.DAC 2020 · 28 citations
