Correlation Loss: Enforcing Correlation between Classification and Localization
Fehmi Kahraman, Kemal Oksuz, Sinan Kalkan, Emre Akbas
Abstract
Object detectors are conventionally trained by a weighted sum of classification and localization losses. Recent studies (e.g., predicting IoU with an auxiliary head, Generalized Focal Loss, Rank & Sort Loss) have shown that forcing these two loss terms to interact with each other in non-conventional ways creates a useful inductive bias and improves performance. Inspired by these works, we focus on the correlation between classification and localization and make two main contributions: (i) We provide an analysis about the effects of correlation between classification and localization tasks in object detectors. We identify why correlation affects the performance of various NMS-based and NMS-free detectors, and we devise measures to evaluate the effect of correlation and use them to analyze common detectors. (ii) Motivated by our observations, e.g., that NMS-free detectors can also benefit from correlation, we propose Correlation Loss, a novel plug-in loss function that improves the performance of various object detectors by directly optimizing correlation coefficients: E.g., Correlation Loss on Sparse R-CNN, an NMS-free method, yields 1.6 AP gain on COCO and 1.8 AP gain on Cityscapes dataset. Our best model on Sparse R-CNN reaches 51.0 AP without test-time augmentation on COCO test-dev, reaching state-of-the-art. Code is available at: https://github.com/fehmikahraman/CorrLoss .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext de1cac5f-9683-4178-b8e8-567c0a853097Cited by top-tier papers2
- Rank-DETR for High Quality Object DetectionYifan Pu, Weicong Liang, Yiduo Hao, Yuhui Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 138 citations
- Pixel-level Quality Assessment for Oriented Object DetectionYunhui Zhu, Buliao HuangAAAI 2026
Builds on16
- Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object DetectionXizhou Zhu, Weijie Su, Lewei Lu, Bin Li et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,353 citations
- FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object DetectionZhi Tian, Chunhua Shen, Hao Chen, Tong HeICCV 2019 · 6,042 citations
- Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object DetectionXiang Li, Wenhai Wang, Lijun Wu, Shuo Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,118 citations
- YOLACT: Real-Time Instance SegmentationDaniel Bolya, Chong Zhou, Fanyi Xiao, Yong Jae LeeICCV 2019 · 2,075 citations
- TOOD: Task-aligned One-stage Object DetectionChengjian Feng, Yujie Zhong, Yu Gao, Matthew R. Scott et al.ICCV 2021 · 1,191 citations
Related papers
- RankDetNet: Delving Into Ranking Constraints for Object DetectionJi Liu, Dong Li, Rongzhang Zheng, Lu Tian et al.CVPR 2021
- Reconcile Prediction Consistency for Balanced Object DetectionKeyang Wang, Lei ZhangICCV 2021 · 36 citations
- Rank & Sort Loss for Object Detection and Instance SegmentationKemal Oksuz, Baris Can Cam, Emre Akbas, Sinan KalkanICCV 2021 · 49 citations
- Revisiting AP Loss for Dense Object Detection: Adaptive Ranking Pair SelectionDongli Xu, Jinhong Deng, Wen LiCVPR 2022 · 9 citations
- A Ranking-based, Balanced Loss Function Unifying Classification and Localisation in Object DetectionKemal Oksuz, Baris Can Cam, Emre Akbas, Sinan KalkanNeurIPS 2020 · 48 citations
