Dynamic Sparsity: Challenging Common Sparsity Assumptions for Learning World Models in Robotic Reinforcement Learning Benchmarks
Muthukumar Pandaram, Jakob J. Hollenstein, David Drexel, Samuele Tosatto, Antonio Jose Rodríguez-Sánchez, Justus H. Piater
Abstract
The use of learned dynamics models, also known as world models, can improve the sample efficiency of reinforcement learning. Recent work suggests that the underlying causal graphs of such dynamics models are sparsely connected, with each of the future state variables depending only on a small subset of the current state variables, and that learning may therefore benefit from sparsity priors. Similarly, temporal sparsity, i.e. sparsely and abruptly changing local dynamics, has also been proposed as a useful inductive bias. In this work, we critically examine these assumptions by analyzing ground truth dynamics from a set of robotic reinforcement learning environments in the MuJoCo Playground benchmark suite, aiming to determine whether the proposed notions of state and temporal sparsity actually tend to hold in typical reinforcement learning tasks. We study (i) whether the causal graphs of environment dynamics are sparse, (ii) whether such sparsity is state-dependent, and (iii) whether local system dynamics change sparsely. Our results indicate that global sparsity is rare, but instead the tasks show local, state-dependent sparsity in their dynamics and this sparsity exhibits distinct structures, appearing in temporally localized clusters (e.g., during contact events) and affecting specific subsets of state dimensions. These findings challenge common sparsity prior assumptions in dynamics learning, emphasizing the need for grounded inductive biases that reflect the state-dependent sparsity structure of real-world dynamics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ddd33fd2-ab50-4f48-8fdb-1e3fb447b9e2Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent ImaginationDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, Mohammad NorouziICLR 2020 · 1,852 citations
- Mastering Atari with Discrete World ModelsDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Mohammad Norouzi, Jimmy BaICLR 2021 · 1,170 citations
- Counterfactual Data Augmentation using Locally Factored DynamicsSilviu Pitis, Elliot Creager, Animesh GargNeurIPS 2020 · 126 citations
- Causal Dynamics Learning for Task-Independent State AbstractionZizhao Wang, Xuesu Xiao, Zifan Xu, Yuke Zhu et al.ICML 2022 · 77 citations
- Sparsely Changing Latent States for Prediction and Planning in Partially Observable DomainsChristian Gumbsch, Martin V. Butz, Georg MartiusNeurIPS 2021 · 30 citations
Related papers
- Fine-Grained Causal Dynamics Learning with Quantization for Improving Robustness in Reinforcement LearningInwoo Hwang, Yunhyeok Kwak, Suhyung Choi, Byoung-Tak Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Deconstructing the Inductive Biases of Hamiltonian Neural NetworksNate Gruver, Marc Anton Finzi, Samuel Don Stanton, Andrew Gordon WilsonICLR 2022 · 50 citations
- SPARTAN: A Sparse Transformer World Model Attending to What MattersAnson Lei, Bernhard Schölkopf, Ingmar PosnerNeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Learning Robust Dynamics through Variational Sparse GatingArnav Kumar Jain, Shivakanth Sujit, Shruti Joshi, Vincent Michalski et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 14 citations
- Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Through Optimistic Thompson SamplingJasmine Bayrooti, Carl Henrik Ek, Amanda ProrokICLR 2025
