Randomized communication and implicit graph representations
Nathaniel Harms, Sebastian Wild, Viktor Zamaraev
Abstract
We initiate the focused study of constant-cost randomized communication, with emphasis on its connection to graph representations. We observe that constant-cost randomized communication problems are equivalent to hereditary (i.e. closed under taking induced subgraphs) graph classes which admit constant-size adjacency sketches and probabilistic universal graphs (PUGs), which are randomized versions of the well-studied adjacency labeling schemes and induced-universal graphs. This gives a new perspective on long-standing questions about the existence of these objects, including new methods of constructing adjacency labeling schemes. We ask three main questions about constant-cost communication, or equivalently, constantsize PUGs: (1) Are there any natural, non-trivial problems aside from Equality and 𝑘-Hamming Distance which have constant-cost communication? We provide a number of new examples, including deciding whether two vertices have path-distance at most 𝑘 in a planar graph, and showing that constant-size PUGs are preserved by the Cartesian product operation. (2) What structures of a problem explain the existence or non-existence of a constant-cost protocol? We show that in many cases a Greater-Than subproblem is such a structure. (3) Is the Equality problem complete for constant-cost randomized communication? We show that it is not: there are constant-cost problems which do not reduce to Equality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ddb89816-d8d2-4211-bd52-6b97036eb1eeCited by top-tier papers7
- Sign-Rank of k-Hamming Distance is ConstantMika Göös, Nathaniel Harms, Valentin Imbach, Dmitry SokolovFOCS 2025 · 6 citations
- No Complete Problem for Constant-Cost Randomized CommunicationYuting Fang, Lianna Hambardzumyan, Nathaniel Harms, Pooya HatamiSTOC 2024 · 4 citations
- Randomized Communication and Implicit Representations for Matrices and Graphs of Small Sign-RankNathaniel Harms, Viktor ZamaraevSODA 2024 · 4 citations
- The Meta-complexity of Secret SharingBenny Applebaum, Oded NirSTOC 2025 · 2 citations
- Constant-Cost Communication Is Not Reducible to k-Hamming DistanceYuting Fang, Mika Göös, Nathaniel Harms, Pooya HatamiSTOC 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on11
- Twin-width I: tractable FO model checkingÉdouard Bonnet, Eun Jung Kim, Stéphan Thomassé, Rémi WatrigantFOCS 2020 · 82 citations
- Twin-width II: small classesÉdouard Bonnet, Colin Geniet, Eun Jung Kim, Stéphan Thomassé et al.SODA 2021 · 61 citations
- Adjacency Labelling for Planar Graphs (and Beyond)Vida Dujmovic, Louis Esperet, Cyril Gavoille, Gwenaël Joret et al.FOCS 2020 · 31 citations
- Rankwidth meets stabilityJaroslav Nesetril, Patrice Ossona de Mendez, Michal Pilipczuk, Roman Rabinovich et al.SODA 2021 · 23 citations
- Stable graphs of bounded twin-widthJakub Gajarský, Michal Pilipczuk, Szymon TorunczykLICS 2022 · 16 citations
Related papers
- Adjacency Sketches in Adversarial EnvironmentsMoni Naor, Eugene PekelSODA 2024 · 1 citation
- Optimal labelling schemes for adjacency, comparability, and reachabilityMarthe Bonamy, Louis Esperet, Carla Groenland, Alex D. ScottSTOC 2021
- Small But Unwieldy: A Lower Bound on Adjacency Labels for Small ClassesEdouard Bonnet, Julien Duron, John Sylvester, Viktor Zamaraev et al.SODA 2024
- The Implicit Graph Conjecture is FalseHamed Hatami, Pooya HatamiFOCS 2022 · 9 citations
- Shorter Labeling Schemes for Planar GraphsMarthe Bonamy, Cyril Gavoille, Michal PilipczukSODA 2020 · 24 citations
