Investigating Prosocial Behavior Theory in LLM Agents Under Policy-Induced Inequities
Yujia Zhou, Hexi Wang, Qingyao Ai, Zhen Wu, Yiqun Liu
Abstract
As large language models (LLMs) increasingly operate as autonomous agents in social contexts, evaluating their capacity for prosocial behavior is both theoretically and practically critical. However, existing research has primarily relied on static, economically framed paradigms, lacking models that capture the dynamic evolution of prosociality and its sensitivity to structural inequities. To address these gaps, we introduce PROSIM 1 , a simulation framework for modeling the prosocial behavior in LLM agents across diverse social conditions. We conduct three progressive studies to assess prosocial alignment. First, we demonstrate that LLM agents can exhibit human-like prosocial behavior across a broad range of real-world scenarios and adapt to normative policy interventions. Second, we find that agents engage in fairness-based third-party punishment and respond systematically to variations in inequity magnitude and enforcement cost. Third, we show that policy-induced inequities suppress prosocial behavior, propagate norm erosion through social networks. These findings advance prosocial behavior theory by elucidating how institutional dynamics shape the emergence, decay, and diffusion of prosocial norms in agent-driven societies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dd925f53-4b7b-4995-952d-ef40ea3eb7dfBuilds on8
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Can Large Language Model Agents Simulate Human Trust Behavior?Chengxing Xie, Canyu Chen, Feiran Jia, Ziyu Ye et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 183 citations
- Cooperate or Collapse: Emergence of Sustainable Cooperation in a Society of LLM AgentsGiorgio Piatti, Zhijing Jin, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Bernhard Schölkopf et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 151 citations
- Knowledge of cultural moral norms in large language modelsAida Ramezani, Yang XuACL 2023 · 44 citations
- Metacognitive Retrieval-Augmented Large Language ModelsYujia Zhou, Zheng Liu, Jiajie Jin, Jian-Yun Nie et al.WWW 2024 · 41 citations
Related papers
- Noise, Adaptation, and Strategy: Assessing LLM Fidelity in Decision-MakingYuanjun Feng, Vivek Choudhary, Yash Raj ShresthaEMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Consistently Simulating Human Personas with Multi-Turn Reinforcement LearningMarwa Abdulhai, Ryan Cheng, Donovan Clay, Tim Althoff et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 51 citations
- Distributive Fairness in Large Language Models: Evaluating Alignment with Human ValuesHadi Hosseini, Samarth KhannaNeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- MetaAgents: Large Language Model Based Agents for Decision-Making on TeamingYuan Li, Lichao Sun, Yixuan ZhangCSCW 2025 · 35 citations
- Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of DebatesAmir Taubenfeld, Yaniv Dover, Roi Reichart, Ariel GoldsteinEMNLP 2024 · 35 citations
