Blue Is the New Black (Market): Privacy Leaks and Re-Victimization from Police-Auctioned Cellphones
Richard Roberts, Julio Poveda, Raley Roberts, Dave Levin
Abstract
In the United States, items in police possession are often sold at auction if they are not claimed. This includes cellphones that the police obtained through civil asset forfeiture, that were stolen, or that were turned in to lost-and-found. Thousands of US police departments partner with a website, PropertyRoom, to auction their items. Over the course of several months, we purchased 228 cellphones from PropertyRoom to ascertain whether they contained personal information. Our results show that a shocking amount of sensitive, personal information is easily accessible, even to a "low-effort" adversary with no forensics expertise: 21.5% of the phones we purchased were not locked at all, another 4.8% used top-40 most common PINs and patterns, and one phone had a sticky-note from the police with the PIN on it. We analyze the content on the 61 phones we could access, finding sensitive information about not only the phones’ previous owners, but also about their personal contacts, and in some cases, about victims of those persons’ crimes. Additionally, we analyze approximately two years of PropertyRoom cellphone auctions, finding multiple instances of identifying information in photos of the items being auctioned, including sticky-notes with PINs, owners’ names and phone numbers, and evidence stickers that reveal how the phones were obtained and the names of the officers who obtained them. Our work shows that police procedures and phone auctions can be a significant source of personal information leakage and re-victimization. We hope that our work is a call to arms to enforce new policies that either prohibit the selling of computing devices containing user information, or at the very least impose requirements to wipe phones in a manner that the US federal government already employs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dd7e85f8-ef72-488a-900c-0babfbbd8b52Cited by top-tier papers2
- Exploring digital security and privacy in relative poverty in Germany through qualitative interviewsAnastassija Kostan, Sara Olschar, Lucy Simko, Yasemin AcarUSENIX Security 2024 · 8 citations
- Surveilling the Masses with Wi-Fi-Based Positioning SystemsErik C. Rye, Dave LevinS&P 2024 · 5 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- How IoT Re-using Threatens Your Sensitive Data: Exploring the User-Data Disposal in Used IoT DevicesPeiyu Liu, Shouling Ji, Lirong Fu, Kangjie Lu et al.S&P 2023
- Evaluating the Privacy Valuation of Personal Data on SmartphonesLihua Fan, Shuning Zhang, Yan Kong, Xin Yi et al.UbiComp 2024 · 4 citations
- Actions Speak Louder than Words: Entity-Sensitive Privacy Policy and Data Flow Analysis with PoliCheckBenjamin Andow, Samin Yaseer Mahmud, Justin Whitaker, William Enck et al.USENIX Security 2020
- PatternListener: Cracking Android Pattern Lock Using Acoustic SignalsMan Zhou, Qian Wang, Jingxiao Yang, Qi Li et al.CCS 2018 · 79 citations
- Finding Clues for Your Secrets: Semantics-Driven, Learning-Based Privacy Discovery in Mobile AppsYuhong Nan, Zhemin Yang, Xiaofeng Wang, Yuan Zhang et al.NDSS 2018 · 79 citations
