Optimizing RAG Rerankers with LLM Feedback via Reinforcement Learning
Yuhang Wu, Xiangqing Shen, Fanfan Wang, Cangqi Zhou, Zhen Wu, Xinyu Dai, Rui Xia
Abstract
Rerankers play a pivotal role in refining retrieval results for Retrieval-Augmented Generation. However, current reranking models are typically optimized on static human annotated relevance labels in isolation, decoupled from the downstream generation process. This isolation leads to a fundamental misalignment: documents identified as topically relevant by information retrieval metrics often fail to provide the actual utility required by the LLM for precise answer generation. To bridge this gap, we introduce ReRanking Preference Optimization (RRPO) 1 , a reinforcement learning framework that directly aligns reranking with the LLM's generation quality. By formulating reranking as a sequential decision-making process, RRPO optimizes for context utility using LLM feedback, thereby eliminating the need for expensive human annotations. To ensure training stability, we further introduce a reference-anchored deterministic baseline. Extensive experiments on knowledge-intensive benchmarks demonstrate that RRPO significantly outperforms strong baselines, including the powerful list-wise reranker RankZephyr. Further analysis highlights the versatility of our framework: it generalizes seamlessly to diverse readers (e.g., GPT-4o), integrates orthogonally with query expansion modules like Query2Doc, and remains robust even when trained with noisy supervisors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dd3fcdc1-b351-4809-b532-bb60436ccc72Builds on26
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
Related papers
- RPO: Retrieval Preference Optimization for Robust Retrieval-Augmented GenerationShi-Qi Yan, Quan Liu, Zhen-Hua LingACL 2025 · 4 citations
- Good Ranks Follow Good Answers: Unsupervised Answer-Driven Reranking for Multimodal Document QAKeyu Zhu, Shuanghong Shen, Xianquan Wang, Kai Zhang et al.SIGIR 2026
- DynamicRAG: Leveraging Outputs of Large Language Model as Feedback for Dynamic Reranking in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationJiashuo Sun, Xianrui Zhong, Sizhe Zhou, Jiawei HanNeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
- Reliability-Aware LLM Alignment from Inconsistent Human FeedbackJingyi Huang, Ruohan Zong, Yujun Feng, Liran Ma et al.ICML 2026
- LLM Alignment as Retriever Optimization: An Information Retrieval PerspectiveBowen Jin, Jinsung Yoon, Zhen Qin, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2025
