PBCAT: Patch-Based Composite Adversarial Training Against Physically Realizable Attacks on Object Detection
Xiao Li, Yiming Zhu, Yifan Huang, Wei Zhang, Yingzhe He, Jie Shi, Xiaolin Hu
Abstract
Object detection plays a crucial role in many security-sensitive applications. However, several recent studies have shown that object detectors can be easily fooled by physically realizable attacks, , adversarial patches and recent adversarial textures, which pose realistic and urgent threats. Adversarial Training (AT) has been recognized as the most effective defense against adversarial attacks. While AT has been extensively studied in the attack settings on classification models, AT against physically realizable attacks on object detectors has received limited exploration. Early attempts are only performed to defend against adversarial patches, leaving AT against a wider range of physically realizable attacks under-explored. In this work, we consider defending against various physically realizable attacks with a unified AT method. We propose PBCAT, a novel Patch-Based Composite Adversarial Training strategy. PBCAT optimizes the model by incorporating the combination of small-area gradient-guided adversarial patches and imperceptible global adversarial perturbations covering the entire image. With these designs, PBCAT has the potential to defend against not only adversarial patches but also unseen physically realizable attacks such as adversarial textures. Extensive experiments in multiple settings demonstrated that PBCAT significantly improved robustness against various physically realizable attacks over state-of-the-art defense methods. Notably, it improved the detection accuracy by 29.7% over previous defense methods under one recent adversarial texture attack.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dd3c41e4-b121-43a2-8fca-a3ff414f02ceCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on23
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object DetectionZhi Tian, Chunhua Shen, Hao Chen, Tong HeICCV 2019 · 6,042 citations
- Accessorize to a Crime: Real and Stealthy Attacks on State-of-the-Art Face RecognitionMahmood Sharif, Sruti Bhagavatula, Lujo Bauer, Michael K. ReiterCCS 2016 · 1,765 citations
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
- DN-DETR: Accelerate DETR Training by Introducing Query DeNoisingFeng Li, Hao Zhang, Shilong Liu, Jian Guo et al.CVPR 2022 · 879 citations
Related papers
- Defending Against Physically Realizable Attacks on Image ClassificationTong Wu, Liang Tong, Yevgeniy VorobeychikICLR 2020 · 143 citations
- DetectorGuard: Provably Securing Object Detectors against Localized Patch Hiding AttacksChong Xiang, Prateek MittalCCS 2021 · 58 citations
- Segment and Complete: Defending Object Detectors against Adversarial Patch Attacks with Robust Patch DetectionJiang Liu, Alexander Levine, Chun Pong Lau, Rama Chellappa et al.CVPR 2022 · 99 citations
- Defending Physical Adversarial Attack on Object Detection via Adversarial Patch-Feature EnergyTaeheon Kim, Youngjoon Yu, Yong Man RoACM MM 2022 · 19 citations
- PAD: Patch-Agnostic Defense against Adversarial Patch AttacksLihua Jing, Rui Wang, Wenqi Ren, Xin Dong et al.CVPR 2024
