High dimensional, tabular deep learning with an auxiliary knowledge graph
Camilo Ruiz, Hongyu Ren, Kexin Huang, Jure Leskovec
Abstract
Machine learning models exhibit strong performance on datasets with abundant labeled samples. However, for tabular datasets with extremely high d -dimensional features but limited n samples (i.e. d ≫ n ), machine learning models struggle to achieve strong performance due to the risk of overfitting. Here, our key insight is that there is often abundant, auxiliary domain information describing input features which can be structured as a heterogeneous knowledge graph (KG). We propose P LATO , a method that achieves strong performance on tabular data with d ≫ n by using an auxiliary KG describing input features to regularize a multilayer perceptron (MLP). In P LATO , each input feature corresponds to a node in the auxiliary KG. In the MLP’s first layer, each input feature also corresponds to a weight vector. P LATO is based on the inductive bias that two input features corresponding to similar nodes in the auxiliary KG should have similar weight vectors in the MLP’s first layer. P LATO captures this inductive bias by inferring the weight vector for each input feature from its corresponding node in the KG via a trainable message-passing function. Across 6 d ≫ n datasets, P LATO outperforms 13 state-of-the-art baselines by up to 10.19%.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dcd9b378-63d5-4455-bd85-e062830b1a74Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular LearningSercan Ö. Arik, Tomas PfisterAAAI 2021 · 2,148 citations
- Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular DataYury Gorishniy, Ivan Rubachev, Valentin Khrulkov, Artem BabenkoNeurIPS 2021 · 1,847 citations
- Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural NetworksWeihua Hu, Bowen Liu, Joseph Gomes, Marinka Zitnik et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,744 citations
- Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation?Chengxuan Ying, Tianle Cai, Shengjie Luo, Shuxin Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,632 citations
Related papers
- TAROT: Task-Adaptive Refinement of LLM-prior Graphs for Few-shot Tabular LearningRuxue Shi, Yili Wang, Mengnan Du, Hangting Ye et al.KDD 2026
- iLTM: Integrated Large Tabular ModelDavid Bonet, Marçal Comajoan Cara, Alvaro Calafell, Daniel Mas Montserrat et al.KDD 2026 · 4 citations
- Weight Predictor Network with Feature Selection for Small Sample Tabular Biomedical DataAndrei Margeloiu, Nikola Simidjievski, Pietro Liò, Mateja JamnikAAAI 2023 · 19 citations
- GOGGLE: Generative Modelling for Tabular Data by Learning Relational StructureTennison Liu, Zhaozhi Qian, Jeroen Berrevoets, Mihaela van der SchaarICLR 2023
- KMLP: A Scalable Hybrid Architecture for Web-Scale Tabular Data ModelingMingming Zhang, Pengfei Shi, Junbo Zhao, Ningtao Wang et al.WWW 2026
