Overlap-Adaptive Regularization for Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation
Valentyn Melnychuk, Dennis Frauen, Jonas Schweisthal, Stefan Feuerriegel
Abstract
The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is widely used in personalized medicine to inform therapeutic decisions. However, state-of-the-art methods for CATE estimation (so-called meta-learners) often perform poorly in the presence of low overlap. In this work, we introduce a new approach to tackle this issue and improve the performance of existing meta-learners in the low-overlap regions. Specifically, we introduce Overlap-Adaptive Regularization (OAR) that regularizes target models proportionally to overlap weights so that, informally, the regularization is higher in regions with low overlap. To the best of our knowledge, our OAR is the first approach to leverage overlap weights in the regularization terms of the meta-learners. Our OAR approach is flexible and works with any existing CATE meta-learner: we demonstrate how OAR can be applied to both parametric and non-parametric second-stage models. Furthermore, we propose debiased versions of our OAR that preserve the Neyman-orthogonality of existing meta-learners and thus ensure more robust inference. Through a series of (semi-)synthetic experiments, we demonstrate that our OAR significantly improves CATE estimation in low-overlap settings in comparison to constant regularization. 2 By naïvely estimating τ (x) = μ1(x) -μ0(x), plug-in learners suffer from so-called plug-in bias (Kennedy, 2023) (e. g., μ0(x) is badly estimated for treated population). This is addressed in (two-stage) meta-learners. Unlike the plug-in learners, meta-learners allow to solve the bias-variance trade-off for the nuisance functions and the target CATE separately (Morzywolek et al., 2023) . Hence, we focus on (two-stage) meta-learners throughout our paper.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dcb948bb-6905-4dfd-8e07-0e45666fe71bCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?Linjun Zhang, Zhun Deng, Kenji Kawaguchi, Amirata Ghorbani et al.ICLR 2021 · 294 citations
- Learning Disentangled Representations for CounterFactual RegressionNegar Hassanpour, Russell GreinerICLR 2020 · 176 citations
- The Implicit and Explicit Regularization Effects of DropoutColin Wei, Sham M. Kakade, Tengyu MaICML 2020 · 129 citations
- On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect EstimationAlicia Curth, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2021 · 114 citations
- Explicit Regularisation in Gaussian Noise InjectionsAlexander Camuto, Matthew Willetts, Umut Simsekli, Stephen J. Roberts et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 90 citations
Related papers
- Meta-Learners for Partially-Identified Treatment Effects Across Multiple EnvironmentsJonas Schweisthal, Dennis Frauen, Mihaela van der Schaar, Stefan FeuerriegelICML 2024 · 10 citations
- Comparison of meta-learners for estimating multi-valued treatment heterogeneous effectsNaoufal Acharki, Ramiro Lugo, Antoine Bertoncello, Josselin GarnierICML 2023 · 18 citations
- Model-agnostic meta-learners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects over timeDennis Frauen, Konstantin Hess, Stefan FeuerriegelICLR 2025
- Conformal Meta-learners for Predictive Inference of Individual Treatment EffectsAhmed M. Alaa, Zaid Ahmad, Mark J. van der LaanNeurIPS 2023 · 32 citations
- Unveiling the Potential of Robustness in Selecting Conditional Average Treatment Effect EstimatorsYiyan Huang, Cheuk Hang Leung, Siyi Wang, Yijun Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
